Thomas v. Grundfos, CBS et al

Filing 53

ORDER entered ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 42 MOTION to Dismiss Individual Defendants, 46 Memorandum and Recommendations. The individuals defendants are dismissed from this case. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MICHEL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. GRUNDFOS, CBS et al., Defendants, § § § § § § § § § April 24, 2019 David J. Bradley, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-0557 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on February 15, 2019, and the objections filed by the plaintiff, Michel Thomas, and made a de novo determination. Rule 72(b), FED. R. CIV. P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court’s Memorandum and Order. This court finds and concludes that the motion to dismiss was properly granted and the claims against Jonathan Hamp-Adams, Thomas Brun Larsen, Paddi Riopelle, Chua Nguyen, Steve Marshall, Billy Baxter, Lonnie Palla, and Terry Jalufka properly dismissed without prejudice. The Magistrate Judge’s recommendation to dismiss all claims against defendants Jonathan Hamp-Adams, Thomas Brun Larsen, Paddi Riopelle, Chua Nguyen, Steve Marshall, Billy Baxter, Lonnie Palla, and Terry Jalufka based on lack of personal jurisdiction is consistent with and supported by the applicable legal standards. The defendants’ motion to dismiss, (Docket Entry No. 42), is granted. SIGNED on April 24, 2019, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?