Butler et al v. Juno Therapeutics, Inc.

Filing 42

ORDER entered DENYING AS MOOT 16 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6).(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION LISA GAYLE BUTLER and DAVID A. HOLLAND, Individually and as Personal Representatives of the ESTATE OF MATY GAYLE HOLLAND, DECEASED, Plaintiffs, v. JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC. Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § § October 03, 2018 David J. Bradley, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-898 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS Lisa Gayle Butler and David A. Holland, the plaintiffs, filed their complaint on March 22, 2018. (Docket Entry No. 1). Juno Therapeutics, Inc., the defendant, moved to dismiss, and the plaintiffs responded. (Docket Entry Nos. 16, 27). At the initial conference, the court heard argument on Juno’s motion to dismiss. (Docket Entry No. 35). The court granted the plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint no later than October 1 and the defendant until October 22 to file an amended or supplemented motion to dismiss. (Id.). On October 1, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, mooting the defendant’s original motion to dismiss. (Docket Entry No. 40). The defendant’s motion to dismiss, (Docket Entry No. 16), is denied as moot. SIGNED on October 3, 2018, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?