Butler et al v. Juno Therapeutics, Inc.
Filing
42
ORDER entered DENYING AS MOOT 16 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6).(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
LISA GAYLE BUTLER and DAVID A.
HOLLAND, Individually and as Personal
Representatives of the ESTATE OF MATY
GAYLE HOLLAND, DECEASED,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
October 03, 2018
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-898
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
Lisa Gayle Butler and David A. Holland, the plaintiffs, filed their complaint on March 22,
2018. (Docket Entry No. 1). Juno Therapeutics, Inc., the defendant, moved to dismiss, and the
plaintiffs responded. (Docket Entry Nos. 16, 27). At the initial conference, the court heard
argument on Juno’s motion to dismiss. (Docket Entry No. 35). The court granted the plaintiffs
leave to file an amended complaint no later than October 1 and the defendant until October 22 to file
an amended or supplemented motion to dismiss. (Id.). On October 1, the plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint, mooting the defendant’s original motion to dismiss. (Docket Entry No. 40).
The defendant’s motion to dismiss, (Docket Entry No. 16), is denied as moot.
SIGNED on October 3, 2018, at Houston, Texas.
______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?