Doohan v. ExxonMobile
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 32 Memorandum and Recommendations granting 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (bthomas, 4)
Case 4:21-cv-01467 Document 34 Filed on 05/18/23 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EXXONMOBIL, et al.,
May 18, 2023
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:21-CV-01467
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On January 18, 2023, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 25) was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B). Dkt. 31. Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation on May
10, 2023, recommending that the motion be GRANTED. Dkt. 32.
On May 16, 2023, Plaintiff filed her Objections. In accordance with 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(C), this Court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions
of the [magistrate judge’s] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to
which objection [has been] made.” After conducting this de novo review, the Court may
“accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by
the magistrate judge.” Id.; see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).
The Court has carefully considered the Objections, the Memorandum and
Recommendation, the pleadings, and the record. The Court ACCEPTS Judge Edison’s
Case 4:21-cv-01467 Document 34 Filed on 05/18/23 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Memorandum and Recommendation and ADOPTS it as the opinion of the Court. It is
therefore ORDERED that:
Judge Edison’s Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 25) is
APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court;
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 25) is GRANTED.
It is so ORDERED.
SIGNED and ENTERED at Houston, Texas on May 18, 2023.
GEORGE C. HANKS, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?