Lee v. Southwest Airlines Company

Filing 140

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 139 Memorandum and Recommendations (Signed by Judge Drew B Tipton) Parties notified. (glk4)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
TAMBRIA LEE,
Plaintiff,
v.
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COMPANY,
Defendant.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

January 27, 2025
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk

Civil Action No. 4:21-CV-01901

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pending before the Court is the January 9, 2025, Memorandum and
Recommendation (“M&R”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Dkt. No. 139).
Judge Bray made findings and conclusions and recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion for
Relief Under Rule 60(b), (Dkt. No. 131), be denied.
The Parties were provided proper notice and the opportunity to object to the M&R.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party filed an objection. As a result,
review is straightforward: plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th
Cir. 2005). No plain error appears.
Accordingly, the Court accepts the M&R and adopts it as the opinion of the Court.
It is therefore ordered that:
(1)

Magistrate Judge Bray’s M&R, (Dkt. No. 139), is ACCEPTED and
ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and

(2)

Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief Under Rule 60(b), (Dkt. No. 131), is DENIED.

It is SO ORDERED.

Signed on January 27, 2025.

___________________________________
DREW B. TIPTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2