Pulliam v. Fort Bend County, Texas et al

Filing 81

ORDER ADOPTING 77 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 61 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment , (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (knp4)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION JUSTIN PULLIAM, Plaintiff. V. FORT BEND COUNTY, et al., Defendants. September 24, 2024 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:22-CV-04210 § § § § ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION On May 3, 2024, Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 61) was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)–(C). Dkt. 75. Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation on September 5, 2024, recommending the motion be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Dkt. 77. On September 19, 2024, Defendants Fort Bend County (the “County”) and Sheriff Eric Fagan (“Fagan”) filed their Objections. Dkt. 79. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [magistrate judge’s] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection [has been] made.” After conducting this de novo review, the Court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” Id.; see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court has carefully considered the Objections; the Memorandum and Recommendation; the pleadings; and the record. The Court ACCEPTS Judge Edison’s Memorandum and Recommendation and ADOPTS it as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that: (1) Judge Edison’s Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 77) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and (2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 61) is GRANTED as to Pulliam’s free speech and equal protection violation claims against Fagan and Fort Bend County arising from the July 2021 press conference; and (3) Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 61) is DENIED as to his First Amendment retaliation claims against the County and Sergeant Taylor Rollins; and (4) Detective Robert Hartfield is entitled to qualified immunity and DISMISSED from this lawsuit. It is so ORDERED. SIGNED at Houston, Texas on September 24, 2024. _______________________________ GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?