Cadence Bank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 123

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 98 granting 23 . Based on the briefing, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court's Memorandum and Order. Chase Bank's motion to dismiss is granted. Because Cadence Bank failed to timely serve EIG Investment Group LLC, the claims against EIG Investment Group LLC are dismissed. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (gmh4)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CADENCE BANK, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § January 27, 2025 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. H-23-2678 ORDER This court has reviewed the United States Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation on Chase Bank’s motion to dismiss Defendant EIG Investment Group LLC, (Docket Entry No. 98), and made a de novo determination. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). No objections were filed. Based on the briefing, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court’s Memorandum and Order. Chase Bank’s motion to dismiss, (Docket Entry No. 23), is granted. Because Cadence Bank failed to timely serve EIG Investment Group LLC, the claims against EIG Investment Group LLC are dismissed. SIGNED on January 27, 2025, at Houston, Texas. ________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?