Cadence Bank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
123
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 98 granting 23 . Based on the briefing, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court's Memorandum and Order. Chase Bank's motion to dismiss is granted. Because Cadence Bank failed to timely serve EIG Investment Group LLC, the claims against EIG Investment Group LLC are dismissed. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (gmh4)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
CADENCE BANK,
Plaintiff,
v.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
January 27, 2025
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-23-2678
ORDER
This court has reviewed the United States Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and
Recommendation on Chase Bank’s motion to dismiss Defendant EIG Investment Group LLC,
(Docket Entry No. 98), and made a de novo determination. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C.
636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). No objections were
filed.
Based on the briefing, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum
and Recommendation as this court’s Memorandum and Order. Chase Bank’s motion to dismiss,
(Docket Entry No. 23), is granted. Because Cadence Bank failed to timely serve EIG Investment
Group LLC, the claims against EIG Investment Group LLC are dismissed.
SIGNED on January 27, 2025, at Houston, Texas.
________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?