Springer v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 92

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 91 ; Denying 76 Opposed MOTION Advisory Jury. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified.(mmarquez, 5)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LAREDO DIVISION
GREGORY SPRINGER,
Plaintiff,
VS.
ORTELLO RODRIGUEZ, et al,
Defendants.

September 16, 2019
David J. Bradley, Clerk

§
§
§
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-CV-108
§
§
§
§
ORDER

Pending is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 91) recommending
that Plaintiff Gregory Springer’s Opposed Motion for Advisory Jury (Dkt. 76) be denied at this
time. The parties have been duly noticed regarding the filing of objections, and the applicable
14-day timeframe for the filing of objections has now lapsed. Noting that no objections have
been filed and having now reviewed the matter as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court
concludes that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ACCEPTED. Thus,
Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. 76) is DENIED at this time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 16th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________
Diana Saldaña
United States District Judge

1/1