Ruglas Barrientos v. Baltazar et al
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 18 MOTION to Dismiss 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified. (bm5)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LAREDO DIVISION
BRYAN REYNALDO RUGLAS
BARRIENTOS,
Plaintiff,
VS.
JUAN BALTAZAR, et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
March 07, 2025
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:24-CV-00005
ORDER
Petitioner Bryan Reynaldo Ruglas Barrientos (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition for a Writ of
Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, raising therein several claims related to his arrival,
removal, and bar of reentry. (Dkt. 1.) The Government filed a Motion to Dismiss Petitioner’s
Petition. (Dkt. 18.) The Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Diana Song-Quiroga (Dkt.
4), who thereafter submitted her Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. 25.) In her Report and
Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommended granting the Government’s defense and
dismissing Petitioner’s claims challenging his parole and bond determinations. (Id. at 4.) The
Magistrate Judge also recommended the Court deny the Government’s defense that the Court
lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review Petitioner’s remaining claim contesting his twentyyear bar of reentry. (Id. at 6–8.)
Over fourteen days have passed since the Parties were served with a copy of this Report
and Recommendation, and no written objections have been filed. Having now reviewed the matter
as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation should
1/2
be and is hereby ADOPTED IN WHOLE. Thus, Petitioner’s Petition (Dkt. 1) is DISMISSED
without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this March 7, 2025.
_______________________________
Diana Saldaña
United States District Judge
2/2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?