Pacheco-Taylor v. United States of America

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 4 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Response to Pacheco-Taylor's Motion for Relief Under 28 U.S.C.§ 2255, Case terminated on 4/20/2017. A certificate of appealability should be DENIED.(Signed by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(BelindaSaenz, 7)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MCALLEN DIVISION PAUL RICHARD PACHECO-TAYLOR VS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § § § § § April 21, 2017 David J. Bradley, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. M-14-CV-701 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. M-12-1940-1 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DISMISSAL The Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation regarding Movant Paul Richard Pacheco-Taylor’s action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. After having reviewed the said Report and Recommendation, and no objections having been filed by either party, the Court is of the opinion that the conclusions in said Report and Recommendation should be adopted by this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the conclusions in United States Magistrate Judge Peter E. Ormsby's Report and Recommendation entered as Docket Entry No. 5 are hereby adopted by this Court. FURTHER, the Court, having adopted the magistrate judge’s conclusions, is of the opinion that Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be GRANTED, the Motion to Vacate Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 should be DISMISSED, and that a certificate of appealability should be DENIED. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the Movant and counsel for Respondent. SO ORDERED this 20th day of April, 2017, at McAllen, Texas. ___________________________________ Randy Crane United States District Judge 1/1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?