Ramirez v. Colvin
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 18 Report and Recommendations (Signed by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(BelindaSaenz, 7)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
December 04, 2017
David J. Bradley, Clerk
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:15-CV-352
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION §
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff=s action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 405(g), which
motion had been referred to the Magistrate Court for a report and recommendation. On October
26, 2017, the Magistrate Court issued the Report and Recommendation, recommending that
Plaintiff’s request for relief be denied, and that the Commissioner’s final decision to deny
benefits be affirmed. The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has reviewed the Report and
Recommendation for clear error.1 Finding no clear error, the Court adopts the Report and
Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request
for relief is DENIED, and the Commissioner’s final decision to deny benefits is AFFIRMED.
As noted by the Fifth Circuit, A[t]he advisory committee=s note to Rule 72(b) states that, >[w]hen no timely
objection is filed, the [district] court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in
order to accept the recommendation.=@ Douglas v. United Services Auto. Ass=n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir.
1996)(quoting Fed. R. Civ. P.72(b) advisory committee=s note (1983)) superceded by statute on other grounds by 28
U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1), as stated in ACS Recovery Servs., Inc v. Griffin, No. 11-40446, 2012 WL 1071216, at *7 n.5
(5th Cir. April 2, 2012).
SO ORDERED this 4th day of December, 2017, at McAllen, Texas.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?