Devine v. Colvin

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 20 Report and Recommendations, 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 17 MOTION for Social Security(Signed by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 7)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MCALLEN DIVISION LACIE ANN DEVINE, Plaintiff, VS. CAROLYN W COLVIN, Defendant. March 27, 2017 David J. Bradley, Clerk § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:16-CV-185 § § § § ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Lacie Ann Devine’s action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of the denial of her application for disability benefits, which had been referred to the Magistrate Court for a report and recommendation. On March 2, 2017, the Magistrate Court issued the Report and Recommendation, recommending that Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin’s motion for summary judgment be granted and that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Court’s Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c), the Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the report to which objections have been made. As to those portions to which no objections have been made, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court reviews the report for clear error. Having reviewed Plaintiff’s objections and after considering the record in this case, the parties’ filing and the applicable law, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary is GRANTED, the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED, and this action is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DONE at McAllen, Texas, this 27th day of March, 2017. ___________________________________ Micaela Alvarez United States District Judge 1/1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?