De Leon v. United States of America

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DISMISSAL re: 15 Report and Recommendation. A certificate of appealability is Denied. Case terminated on 9/30/2020. (Signed by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(JenniferNogueira, 7)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MCALLEN DIVISION JUAN DE LEON VS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA September 30, 2020 David J. Bradley, Clerk § CIVIL ACTION NO. M-17-003 § § § CRIMINAL ACTION NO. M-11-381-1 § § ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DISMISSAL The Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation regarding Movant Juan De Leon’s action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and Movant’s objections thereto. After having reviewed the said Report and Recommendation, and after appropriate review of Movant's objections thereto, the Court is of the opinion that the conclusions in said Report and Recommendation should be adopted by this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the conclusions in United States Magistrate Judge Juan F. Alanis' Report and Recommendation entered as Docket Entry No. 15 are hereby adopted by this Court. FURTHER, the Court, having adopted the magistrate judge’s conclusions, is of the opinion that Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be GRANTED, Movant’s Request for Counsel be DENIED, the Motion to Vacate Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 should be DISMISSED, and that a certificate of appealability should be DENIED. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the Movant and counsel for Respondent. SO ORDERED this 30th day of September, 2020, at McAllen, Texas. ___________________________________ Randy Crane United States District Judge 1/1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?