Aubrey et al v. Barlin et al

Filing 727

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 725 Motion for Filing Privileges. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (os)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION STEVEN B. AUBREY and BRIAN E. VODICKA, Plaintiffs, vs. PETER E. BARLIN, GREGORY H. LAHR, SANDRA F. GUNN, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § 1-10-CV-076-DAE ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FILING PRIVILEGES Before the Court is Plaintiff Steve Aubrey’s Motion for Electronic Filing Privileges for himself and for Plaintiff Brian Vodicka. (Dkt. # 725.) The motion is GRANTED IN PART. Mr. Aubrey is granted permission to file documents electronically pursuant to the electronic filing requirements for a pro se litigant contained in the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal Cases, found online in the “General Information” section of the “CM/ECF” tab at www.txwd.uscourts.gov. Mr. Aubrey must register as a “Filing User” and receive a login and password from the district court to use the Court’s electronic filing system. Mr. Aubrey’s request for filing privileges on behalf of Mr. Vodicka is 1 DENIED. Mr. Aubrey does not have a law license; accordingly, he may not represent other parties in federal court and is not permitted to make a request on behalf of Mr. Vodicka. 28 U.S.C. § 1654; Weber v. Garza, 570 F.2d 511, 514 (5th Cir. 1978); see also Guajardo v. Luna, 432 F.2d 1324, 1324 (5th Cir. 1970) (holding that an individual who is not admitted to practice law is “not authorized to appear in any court to represent a third party”). Accordingly, Mr. Aubrey’s Motion for Electronic Filing Privileges is GRANTED as to himself, and DENIED as to Plaintiff Brian Vodicka (Dkt. # 725). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Austin, Texas, February 26, 2016. _____________________________________ David Alan Ezra Senior United States Distict Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?