Munoz v. Seton Healthcare, et al.

Filing 64

ORDER DENYING 59 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (jk)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
VIRGINIA C. MUNOZ

§
§
§
§
§
§

V.
SETON HEALTHCARE D/B/A
SETON HEALTH NETWORK, ET AL.

A-11-CA-151-LY

ORDER
Before the Court are: Plaintiff’s Request for Ordered Production of Evidence Which is Needed
to Secure Evidence under Federal Rule 26, filed on November 2, 2012 (Clerk’s Docket No. 59), and
Defendants’ Response (Clerk’s Docket No. 63).
In her latest Motion to Compel, Plaintiff asks the Court to compel Defendant to produce

various safety policies and procedures it has in place. Defendant has already produced 37 pages of
safety policies to Plaintiff. Plaintiff has failed to explain how any of the requested documents are
relevant to her employment discrimination lawsuit. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Request for Ordered
Production of Evidence (Clerk’s Docket No. 59) is HEREBY DENIED.
Finally, the Court finds it necessary to warn Plaintiff that the continual filing of meritless
discovery motions will result in the imposition of sanctions against her.

SIGNED this 28th day of November, 2012.

_____________________________________
ANDREW W. AUSTIN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE