Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services et al v. Abbott et al

Filing 97

FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (kkc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS SURGICAL HEALTH SERVICES, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, PLANNED PARENTHOOD SEXUAL HEALTHCARE SERVICES, PLANNED PARENTHOOD WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER, WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH, AUSTIN WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER KILLEEN HEALTH CENTER, SOUTHWESTERN WOMEN'S SURGERY CENTER, WEST SIDE CLINIC, INC., ROUTH STREET WOMEN'S CLINIC, HOUSTON WOMEN'S CLINIC, EACH ON BEHALF OF ITSELF, ITS PATIENTS AND PHYSICIANS, ALAN BRAID, M.D., LAMAR ROBINSON, M.D., PAMELA J. RICHTER, D.O., EACH ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND THEIR PATIENTS, PLAINTIFFS, 20130C128 PH I:3 LtTRi CLERK U3 COURT WESIERM STRJCT OF TEXAS § § PT P UT Y § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § V. § CAUSE NO. 1:1 3-CV-862-LY § GREGORY ABBOTT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS; DAVID LAKEY, M.D., COMMISSIONER OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES; AND MART ROBINSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD, DEFENDANTS. § § § § § § § § FINAL JUDGMENT Before the court is the above styled and numbered cause. On October 18, 2013, upon stipulation of the parties, the court dismissed from this action Defendants David Escamilla, County Attorney for Travis County, Craig Watkins, Criminal District Attorney for Dallas County, Devon Anderson, District Attorney for Harris County, Matthew Powell, Director of the Lubbock County Criminal District Attorney's Office, James E. Nichols, County Attorney for Bell County, Joe Shannon, Jr., Criminal District Attorney for Tarrant County, René Guerra, Criminal District Attorney for Hidalgo County, Susan D. Reed, Criminal District Attorney for Bexar County, Abelino Reyna, Criminal District Attorney for El Paso County, and Jaime Esparza, District Attorney for El Paso County, each in their official capacities, as well as their employees, agents, and successors. On this date by Memorandum Opinion Incorporating Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the court has made certain findings and conclusions in this case. Based on the findings and conclusions the court renders this final judgment. THE COURT DECLARES that the following portions of Act of July 12, 2013, 83rd Leg., 2d C.S., ch. 1, 1. § 1-12, 2013 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 4795-4802 ("act") are unconstitutional: The proposed amendment to the Health and Safety Code of the State of Texas adding Section 171.0031(a)(l) found in Section 2 of the act at page 2, lines 18 through 25. 2. The proposed amendment to the Health and Safety Code of the State of Texas adding section 171.063(a)(2), (b), (c), (e), and (f) found in Section 3 of the act at page 10, lines 27 and page 11 lines 1 1 through through 24, to the extent those provisions prohibit a medication abortion where a physician determines in appropriate medical judgment, such a procedure is necessary for the preservation of the life or health of the mother. IT IS ORDERED that the State of Texas, its agents, employees, and any other persons or entities acting on its behalf are enjoined from enforcing those sections of the act to the extent stated herein, including enforcing the criminal and administrative penalties provided by the act against any person accused of violating any provision of the act declared unconstitutional by this final judgment. 2 Any claim for attorney's fees incurred in this action will be determined post judgment and pursuant to Rule CV-7(j), of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs recover their costs of court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, except as expressly provided herein, all other relief requested by any party is DENIED. SIGNED this day of October, 2013. 1 / UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?