Scott v. Perry et al
ORDER DENYING 6 Motion to Recuse. FiNALLY ORDERED that the above-styled and numbered cause is TRANSFERRED to the Austin Docket of the Honorable Lee Yeakel, United States District Judge. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (td)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
GEORGE R. SCOTT III,
Case No. A-15-CA-11-SS
JAMES RICHARD PERRY, ELIZABETH M.
DARLING, THE TEXAS GOVERNORS
OFFICE, and THE ONESTAR FOUNDATION
BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause,
and specificallypro se Plaintiff George R. Scott III's Motion to Recuse [#6], filed January 26, 2015.
Scott moves to recuse United States District Judge Lee Yeakel from this action on grounds Judge
Yeakel was appointed by former President George W. Bush, who "could become" a named
defendant in the suit. Mot. Recuse [#6] at
The Court now enters the following order DENYING
According to Scott' spro se Complaint [#1], Defendant Elizabeth M. Darling, to whom Scott
was formerly married, "created and caused a Faith Based sex scandal" by using "Texas State funds
to pay for expenses related to multiple adulterous affairs." Compl. [#1] at 5. Scott alleges Governor
Perry "has been and is currently involved in the cover up of Ms Darling's Faith-Based sex scandal
which he inherited from President George W. Bush when he appointed Ms Darling as President/CEO
of his Faith Based creation, The Onestar Foundation of Texas in 2009." Id. at
Having reviewed the Complaint and the file as a whole, the Court can discern absolutely no
meritorious basis upon which former President George W. Bush could be named as a defendant in
this lawsuit. Moreover, even were Scott to name former President Bush as a defendant, a federal
judge need not recuse himself from every case involving the President who appointed him. See, e.g.,
Armenian Assembly of Am., Inc.
Cafesjian, 783 F. Supp. 2d 78, 93 (D.C. Cir. 2011) ("The case
law is clear that recusal is not warranted where a judge is alleged to be biased based solely on
political connections to the President who appointed [him]."); United States
Gordon, 974 F.2d
1110, 1114 (9th Cir. 1992), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Bagdasarian, 652 F.3d
1113 (2011) ("It is not reasonable to suspect that Judge Rafeedie's ability to preside impartially
would be affected by the fact that President Reagan appointed him."). A federal judgeship is a lifetenured position, and federal judges take an oath to "faithfully and impartially discharge and perform
under the Constitution and laws of the United States." 28 U.S.C.
453. As the D.C.
Circuit has noted, Justices Ginsburg and Breyer, both Clinton appointees, participated in Clinton v.
Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997), and Chief Justice Burger and Justices Blackmun and Powell, all Nixon
appointees, participated in United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). In re Executive Office of
the President, 215 F.3d 25, 25-26 (D.C. Cir. 2000). Consequently, the Court finds Judge Yeakel
need not recuse himself from this case.
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Recuse [#6] is DENIED; and
IT IS FiNALLY ORDERED that the above-styled and numbered cause is
TRANSFERRED to the Austin Docket of the Honorable Lee Yeakel, United States District
SIGNED this the
47day of February 2015.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
mot recuse den ba.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?