Samaratunga Family Trust v. American Towers LLC et al
ORDER DENYING 19 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (td)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SAMARATUNGA FAMILY TRUST
AMERICAN TOWER, INC. et al.
Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (Dkt. No. 19); and
Plaintiff’s Opposition (Dkt. No. 25). The District Judge has referred all matters in this case to the
undersigned for resolution or recommendation. Dkt. No. 30. Because the motion is non-dispositive
the Court has the power to resolve the motion. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); FED. R. CIV. P. 72; Rule
1(c) of Appendix C of the Local Court Rules.
In the motion, American Towers moves for an award of attorney’s fees and costs based upon
the undersigned’s Report and Recommendation on American Tower’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No.
10), and the District Court’s adoption of that Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 11). The R&R
recommended that the Plaintiff’s Texas Theft Liability Act claim be dismissed. American Towers
asserts that under the statute, it is mandatory that the “prevailing party” be awarded attorneys’ fees
and costs. Merritt Hawkins & Assoc., L.L.C. v. Gresham, 861 F.3d 143, 155-57 (5th Cir. 2017) .
It requests $29,667.93 in combined fees and costs. Samaratunga Family Trusts opposes the motion.
The Court will deny the motion because it is premature. Local Rule CV-7(j)(1) (“Claims for
Attorney’s Fees”) states:
(1) Unless the substantive law requires a claim for attorney’s fees and related
nontaxable expenses to be proved at trial as an element of damages to be determined
by a jury, a claim for fees shall be made by motion not later than 14 days after entry
of judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2) and pursuant to
[the terms of the local rule].
Among other things, Local Rule CV-7(j) requires that no motion for attorney’s fees may be filed
until the attorneys have met and attempted to resolve all of the issues they can related to motion. As
far as the Federal Rules are concerned, Rule 54 also contemplates that attorney’s fees be taken up
after judgment. It further provides that:
[w]hen an action presents more than one claim for relief . . . the court may direct
entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only
if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay. Otherwise, any
order or other decision, however designated, that adjudicates fewer than all the
claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties does not end the action
as to any of the claims or parties and may be revised at any time before the entry of
a judgment adjudicating all the claims and all the parties’ rights and liabilities.
FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b). Under Rule 54, the order adopting the undersigned’s recommendation and
dismissing the Texas Theft Liability Act claim is not a final appealable order, and thus no
“judgment” as to that claim has been entered. Because the order dismissing the Texas Theft Liability
Act claim in not a judgment, Defendant’s Motion is premature.1
For the reasons stated above, Defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (Dkt. No. 19)
is DENIED without prejudice to being reurged after judgment, if appropriate.
SIGNED this 11th day of January, 2018.
ANDREW W. AUSTIN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The motion also lacks the required certificate of conference and could be denied on this basis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?