Corestates Construction Services, Inc. v. Red Beard Excavators, Inc.
Filing
43
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 40 ) as the opinion of the Court, and GRANTS Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. # 29 ). It is ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded actual and liquidated damages in the amount of $2,994,138.61. The Clerk's Office is INSTRUCTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and CLOSE THE CASE. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (pg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
CORESTATES CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES, INC.,
§
§
§
Plaintiff,
§
§
vs.
§
§
RED BEARD EXCAVATORS, LLC,
§
§
Defendant.
§
________________________________ §
NO. 1:22-CV-898-DAE
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND GRANTING
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation filed by U.S.
Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (Dkt. # 40.) On September 3, 2024, the Court
referred Plaintiff CoreStates Construction Services, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff” or
“Corestates”) Amended Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. # 29) to Magistrate
Judge Lane. Magistrate Judge Lane filed his Report and Recommendation (the
“Report”) on December 5, 2024. Objections to the Report were due within 14 days
after being served with a copy. 1 Neither party filed any objections to the Report.
Despite failing to enter an appearance in this case, the Court requested that
Defendant be served a copy.
1
BACKGROUND
The Court will recite the facts as stated by the Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff brought this breach of contract claim based on diversity jurisdiction
against Defendant, Red Beard Excavators, LLC (“Defendant”). (Dkt. 1.) Plaintiff
seeks to recover damages for the breach of four separate subcontract agreements
(“the Subcontracts”). (Id.; Dkt. # 29.) The Defendant was served (Dkt. # 4), but it
did not answer.
At Plaintiff’s request, the Clerk’s Office entered an amended entry of
default against Defendant. (Dkt. # 27.) On August 30, 2024, Plaintiff moved for
entry of default judgment in an amended motion against Defendant. (Dkt. # 29.)
The Court thereafter referred that motion to Magistrate Judge Lane. Plaintiff
originally sought $3,301,620.61 in actual and liquidated damages plus prejudgment
interest, court costs and attorneys fees. (Id. at 8.) According to Judge Lane’s
Report, Plaintiff now seeks only actual and liquidated damages in the sum of
$3,024,138.61 due to Defendant’s breach of the Subcontract Agreements. (Dkt.
# 40.) Defendant did not respond to the motion.
On December 5, 2024, Magistrate Judge Lane entered his Report on
the motion for default judgment, recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff’s
motion. (Dkt. # 40.) No objections were filed.
2
ANALYSIS
Where, as here, neither party objects to the Magistrate Judge’s
findings, the Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error.
United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989).
After careful consideration, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation. The Court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s
conclusion is correct that Defendant has not entered an appearance in this case or
otherwise responded, and that “[c]onsidering the relevant factors, default is
procedurally warranted.” (Dkt. # 40 at 4.) Additionally, the Magistrate Judge’s
conclusion that Plaintiff has demonstrated the elements of his claim and that “[n]o
material facts appear to be at issue, there is no substantial prejudice that warrants
against entering default, grounds for default are clearly established, there is no
indication default was caused by good faith mistake or excusable neglect, default is
not overly harsh, and there is no apparent reason that default would need to be set
aside,” along with the Magistrate Judge’s calculation of damages are neither
clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, for the reasons given, the Court ADOPTS the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 40) as the opinion of the
Court, and GRANTS Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt.
3
# 29). It is ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded actual and liquidated damages in
the amount of $2,994,138.61. The Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to ENTER
JUDGMENT and CLOSE THE CASE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: Austin, Texas, January 6, 2025.
______________________________________
David Alan Ezra
Senior United States District Judge
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?