Galan Huezo v. DJR, Inc. et al
Filing
8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Oscar Reinaldo Galan Huezo. Show Cause Response due by 5/24/2024. Signed by Judge Susan Hightower. (pg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
OSCAR REINALDO GALAN HUEZO,
Plaintiff
v.
DJR, INC. d/b/a ENCORE
MECHANICAL, DALE REEVES, and
TAMMI DANIELSON,
Defendants
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Case No. 1:24-CV-00132-RP
ORDER
Plaintiff Oscar Reinaldo Galan Huezo filed his Complaint on February 6, 2024 (Dkt. 1). To
date, however, there is no indication that Plaintiff has served Defendants with the complaint and
summons. Plaintiff filed returns of non-service for Defendants DJR, Inc. and Dale Reeves on
February 29, 2024. Dkts. 6-7. “If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is
filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action
without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.”
FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m). More than 90 days have passed since Plaintiff filed his Complaint.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause in writing on or before May 24, 2024, as to
why the claims against Defendants should not be dismissed for failure to timely effect service.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b) (action may be
dismissed for want of prosecution or failure to comply with court order); Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d
1030, 1031 (5th Cir. 1998) (district court has authority to dismiss case for want of prosecution or
failure to comply with court order).
SIGNED on May 10, 2024.
SUSAN HIGHTOWER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?