Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo v. City Of El Paso et al
Filing
96
ORDER AMENDING 94 Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motion for Summary Judgment as follows: All claims asserted by Plaintiff Ysleta Del SurPueblo against Defendant City of El Paso in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mc4)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO DIVISION
YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO, a federally
§
recognizedsovereign Indian tribe,
§
§
Plaintiff
V.
CITY OF EL PASO,
Defendant.
§
§
EP-17-CV-00162-DCG
§
§
§
§
ORDER AMENDING MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
On this day, the Court issued a "Memorandum Opinion and Order" (ECF No. 94). The
Court observes that there is a typographical error in this Order. Specifically, on page 20, the
Order states that "IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims asserted by Plaintiff Ysleta Del
Sur Pueblo against Defendant City of El Paso in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE", whereas the Court intended the order to state: "DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE" as reflected in the "Final Judgment" (ECF No. 95). Accordingly, the
"Memorandum Opinion and Order" (ECF No. 94) is REVISED and AMENDED as follows:
On page 20,
"IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims asserted by Plaintiff Ysleta Del Sur
Pueblo against Defendant City of El Paso in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE."
So ORDERED and SIGNED this
day of January 2020.
TD C. GUADERHRAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?