Callier v. Momentum Solar LLC

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 14 Report and Recommendations, Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R, ECF No. 14, in its entirety, and ORDERS that Defendants Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 7, is DENIE, Motions terminated: 7 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) and Brief In Support filed by Momenum Solar LLC. Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (em)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO DIVISION BRANDON L CALLIER, Plaintiff, v. MOMENTUM SOLAR LLC, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § CAUSE NO. EP-23-CV-377-KC ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On this day, the Court considered the above-captioned case. Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”), ECF No. 7, on November 8, 2023. On April 16, 2024, the Court referred the Motion to United States Magistrate Judge Robert F. Castaneda pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) for proposed findings of fact and recommendations. Apr. 16, 2024, Text Order. On April 25, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 14, recommending that the Motion be denied. Id. at 5. Parties have fourteen days from service of a Report and Recommendation of a United States Magistrate Judge to file written objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).1 Over fourteen days have elapsed since all parties were served with the R&R, and no objections have been filed. When parties do not file written objections, courts apply a “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review to a report and recommendation. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). After reviewing the R&R, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and finds 1 Federal district courts conduct de novo review of those portions of a report and recommendation to which a party has objected. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (“A judge . . . shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made . . . .”). that they are neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. See id. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R, ECF No. 14, in its entirety, and ORDERS that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 7, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 10th day of May, 2024. KATHLEEN CARDONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?