Alvarez, et al v. AMB-Trans Inc. et al
Filing
85
ORDER re 77 Findings of Fact and Conclusions. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rf)
In the United States District Court
for the
Western District of Texas
DAVID ALVAREZ, ET. AL.
v.
AMB-TRANS, INC. AND MAURICE
SHANER
§
§
§
§
§
SA-11-CV-179-XR
ORDER
On this day the Court considered Plaintiff’s brief and calculations regarding damages and
Defendants’ brief regarding same.
On November 7, 2012, the Court issued its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
concluding that AMB-Trans, Inc. and Maurice Shaner were employers under the Fair Labor
Standards Act and that they violated the FLSA by impermissibly deducting hours from meal
periods because the Plaintiffs were not completely relieved from duty. Further, the Court found
that Defendants provided Plaintiffs uninterrupted sleep time only 50% of the time they worked.
Finally, the Court concluded that Defendants’ actions in violating the FLSA were willful. The
Court thereafter requested that the parties brief the issue of appropriate damages.
Actual Damages
In conformity with the rulings found by the Court, Plaintiff Alvarez has calculated that he
has suffered damages in the amount of $35,157.10. Plaintiff Gleed has calculated that he has
suffered damages in the amount of $14,787.80. Plaintiff Crist has calculated that he has suffered
damages in the amount of $5,343.70.1 The Court finds that Plaintiffs’ damage calculations
1
Defendants have calculated damages as follows: Plaintiff Alvaraez - $12,291.57; Plaintiff Gleed - $7,369.78; and
Plaintiff Crist - $820.90. The Court is unable to determine what formula Defendants used to make their calculations
and there appears to be substantial discrepencies in their calculations. For example, Plaintiff Jordan David Crist was
employed with Defendant AMB-Trans, Inc. from September 14, 2009 until January 4, 2010. He worked 48 hour
shifts. Accordingly, one week he worked 72 hours and the following week 96 hours. Although he was on call 24
correctly reflect the Court’s rulings and reflect the actual unpaid wages suffered by Plaintiffs in
this case.
Liquidated Damages
The FLSA damage provisions also provide for liquidated damages in an amount equal to
the unpaid wages. 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). In Heidtman v. County of El Paso, 171 F.3d 1038 (5th
Cir. 1999), the Fifth Circuit reaffirmed that the employer has the burden of demonstrating that it
acted in good faith and on reasonable grounds to defeat an FLSA liquidated damages claim. A
court may, in its discretion, reduce or eliminate the liquidated damages when the defendant had a
good faith belief that its conduct was not unlawful. 29 U.S.C. § 260.
As stated above, this Court has already found that Defendants did not have a good faith
belief that their conduct was lawful. Defendants’ actions in violating the FLSA were willful.
Even if the Court retained discretion not to award liquidated damages in an amount equal to the
unpaid wages, the Court concludes that a full liquidated damages award is appropriate in this
case. Despite previously being investigated by the Department of Labor, the employer in this
case implemented cosmetic changes to its payroll practices to merely give the appearance of
wage and hour compliance.
Attorney’s fees and costs
Plaintiffs seek recovery of their attorney’s fees and costs of court. Plaintiff’s counsel
must comply with WDTX Local Rule CV-7. Any claim for fees and costs shall be made by
motion not later than 14 days after entry of judgment. The parties must confer on any motion for
fees as indicated in Local Rule CV-7.
hours, he was generally only paid for 13 hours. Most “payroll recap” documents indicate he was routinely deducted
for 3 meal periods and 8 sleep hours. Defendants’ calculations have him paid initially at $10 per hour with a later
increase to $12.82 and then a pay cut to $7.25 per hour. There was no evidence in this case that his pay was cut.
See Defendants’ Ex. 4. Although he worked 17 pay periods, Defendants’ calculations only provide him for
additional compensation during four pay periods. Defendants’ calculations and their assumptions are unreliable.
2
Conclusion
After review of all the evidence in this case, the previously issued findings of fact and
conclusions of law, and the parties’ latest briefs regarding damages, the Court finds that Plaintiff
Alvarez has suffered actual unpaid wages in the amount of $35,157.10, Plaintiff Gleed has
suffered actual unpaid wages in the amount of $14,787.80, and Plaintiff Crist has suffered actual
unpaid wages in the amount of $5,343.70. Plaintiffs are awarded liquidated damages in an
amount equal to the unpaid wages. Plaintiffs are also awarded their costs of court and reasonable
attorney’s fees. The Clerk is directed to issue a Judgment accordingly. Any claim for attorney’s
fees and costs of court shall be made by motion not later than 14 days after entry of judgment.
SIGNED this 29th day of January, 2013.
XAVIER RODRIGUEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?