Torres v. Hidalgo et al
ORDER TERMINATING 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; DENYING 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee on or before 30 days form the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Nancy Stein Nowak. (kh2)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
in his individual capacity; and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS
The matter before the court is plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, as
supplemented (docket entries 1 and 3). Plaintiff requests pauper status in order to file a complaint
under the Federal Tort Claims Act and the Fifth Amendment. Plaintiff claims that he suffered “light
bruising and soreness” as a result of a September 24, 2008 assault and battery by defendant Robert
Hildalgo, an IRS agent, during the course of a meeting with Hildago at a local IRS office. Torres
is represented in this lawsuit by Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, Inc.
Plaintiff reports that he is self employed as a real estate agent. His take home pay is
approximately $1,800 and his monthly expenses for rent, utilities, food and transportation total
$1,740. He lists assets consisting of a home (valued at $100,000), other real estate (valued at
$10,000), a 2010 Mustang (valued at $6,000), and 2000 Ford Expedition (valued at $3,500). He
reports cash on hand as $1,100. While plaintiff need not establish that he is totally destitute before
he may be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, after examining his statements concerning
expenses, income, and assets I find this plaintiff has the resources to pay the $350 filing fee to
initiate this action, without being deprived of the necessities of life.1
It is therefore ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.
2. On or before 30 days from date of this Order, plaintiff shall pay the required filing fee in
3. In the event plaintiff wishes to appeal from my denial of the application for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, he must file his appeal to the District Court from this Order within 14
days of the date of this Order.
4. Plaintiff is advised that in the event that he fails to either pay the filing fee or file an
appeal from this Order within the time frames set forth above, the District Court will issue an Order
dismissing this cause without prejudice.
SIGNED on August 13, 2011.
NANCY STEIN NOWAK
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?