Brenda Pacheco, et al. v. Wessam Aldeeb, et al.

Filing 79

ORDER GRANTING 68 Motion for Protective Order; GRANTING 68 Motion for Sanctions Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (sf)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
BRENDA PACHECO, in her individual §
capacity, and MAXIMILIANO LOPEZ §
and CAROL BUCHANAN, on behalf of§
themselves and a class of those similarly §
situated,
§
§
Plaintiffs,
§
§
vs.
§
§
WESSAM ALDEEB; ERSAN
§
ALDEEB; SAADIA RACHIK; PALMS §
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC; §
LA CANTERA SUBWAY, INC.;
§
NORTH STAR MARBLE SLAB INC.; §
GREAT AMERICAN COOKIES-N- §
CREAM, LLC; PYRAMIDS
§
EXCHANGE, LLC; LEGACY
§
MARBLE SLAB, INC.; WESTOVER §
MARBLE SLAB, INC.; LEGACY
§
SUBWAY, INC.; INGRAM PARK
§
MARBLE SLAB, LLC; and NORTH §
STAR SWIRLY, LLC,
§
§
Defendants.
§
_______________________________

CV. NO. 5:14-CV-121-DAE

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER,
CORRECTIVE NOTICE, AND SANCTIONS
Before the Court is a Motion for Protective Order, Corrective Notice,
and Sanctions filed by Plaintiffs Maximiliano Lopez and Carol Buchanan, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Brenda Pacheco, Miguel
1

Robles, Karen Green, and Robert Maldonado (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) (Dkt.
# 68). The Court held a hearing on the Motion on September 1, 2015. At the
hearing, Sarah Donaldson and Philip Moss, Esqs., represented Plaintiffs, and
Haroon Rafati, Esq., represented Defendants Wessam Aldeeb; Ersan Aldeeb;
Saadia Rachik; Palms Administrative Services, LLC; La Cantera Subway, Inc.;
North Star Marble Slab Inc.; Great American Cookies-N-Cream, LLC; Pyramids
Exchange, LLC; Legacy Marble Slab, Inc.; Westover Marble Slab, Inc.; Legacy
Subway, Inc.; Ingram Park Marble Slab, LLC; and North Star Swirly, LLC
(collectively, “Defendants”). After careful consideration of the supporting and
opposing memoranda and the parties’ arguments at the hearing, the Court, for the
reasons that follow, GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order, Corrective
Notice, and Sanctions.
BACKGROUND
On February 11, 2014, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint in this
Court asserting that Defendants failed to pay their employees for all hours worked
and for overtime in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C.
§§ 201–219, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons employed
by Defendants in the three years prior to filing the Complaint. (Dkt. # 2 ¶¶ 41, 43–
44.) Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint on June 22, 2015. (Dkt. # 64.)

2

Plaintiffs seek unpaid overtime wages, unpaid minimum wages, liquidated
damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs. (Id. at 10–11.)
On March 31, 2015, the Court entered an Order conditionally
certifying the class, but found that named plaintiff Brenda Pacheco (“Pacheco”)
could not represent the class and must proceed as an individual plaintiff because
she is not similarly situated to the class of hourly wage employees. (Dkt. # 37.)
On April 6, 2015, the Court entered an Order providing for notice to potential class
members, setting a 60-day notice period, and giving Plaintiffs 15 days following
the expiration of the notice period to file notices of consent to join the lawsuit.
(Dkt. # 39.)
On July 20, 2015, Plaintiffs filed the instant Motion for Protective
Order, Corrective Notice, and Sanctions. (Dkt. # 68.) Plaintiffs allege that
Defendants “have engaged in an improper campaign to frustrate the
Court-supervised notice and to keep Plaintiffs and Class Members from
participating in the lawsuit.” (Id. at 1.) Plaintiffs specifically allege that
Defendants have demanded that current employees sign releases as a condition to
receiving paychecks, withheld paychecks from employees who would not sign
such releases, represented to plaintiffs and class members that there was no point
in joining the lawsuit and that the lawsuit had ended, offered an opt-in plaintiff a
raise if he dropped his claims, reduced the hours of an opt-in plaintiff, and offered
3

money to an employee to persuade other plaintiffs to dismiss their claims. (Id. at
1–2.) In support of these allegations, Plaintiffs have submitted the declarations of
opt-in plaintiff Tevin Todd (“Todd”), opt-in plaintiff Erik Ibarra (“Ibarra”), and
individual plaintiff Pacheco.
Todd worked for Defendants’ Marble Slab Creamery franchises from
2014 until July 2015. (“Todd Decl.,” Dkt. # 68-1 ¶ 2.) Todd declares that
Defendant Ersan Aldeeb (“Aldeeb”) told him and several other employees that
“there was no point in signing up for the lawsuit because people were not going to
get paid.” (Id. ¶ 3.) After Todd joined the lawsuit, Aldeeb asked why he had
joined the lawsuit, and the same day offered Todd a $1,000 loan. (Id. ¶ 5.) Shortly
thereafter, Aldeeb offered Todd a raise if he wrote an email to Plaintiffs’ counsel
stating that he wanted to dismiss his claims. (Id. ¶ 6.) Todd did not want to send
the email but was concerned that he would not receive a raise if he did not
cooperate. (Id.) Aldeeb told Todd what to write, and watched him write and send
the email. 1 (Id.) In June 2015, Aldeeb called Todd and told him “the lawsuit was
over.” (Id. ¶ 7.)
Pacheco worked for Defendants’ Marble Slab Creamery and Great
American Cookies franchises from 2007 through 2013, with a gap of about one
year around 2009. (“Pacheco Decl.,” Dkt. # 68-3 ¶ 2.) Pacheco also returned to
1

Defendants have submitted what appears to be the correspondence in question
from Todd to Plaintiffs’ counsel, albeit in letter form. (See Dkt. # 69-2, Ex. B.)
4

work for the companies in May and June of 2015 “in order to pay bills and support
[her] family.” (Id. ¶¶ 2, 6.) In May 2015, Defendant Wessam Aldeeb asked that
Pacheco contact named plaintiffs Maximiliano Lopez and Carol Buchanan to
persuade them to drop the lawsuit, and offered her money if she was successful.
(Id. ¶ 10.) Also in May, Wessam Aldeeb wrote emails to be sent by Pacheco to
Plaintiffs’ attorneys requesting that Plaintiffs’ counsel not contact Pacheco and that
they drop her case. (Id. ¶ 7.) Pacheco believes Wessam Aldeeb sent at least one
email to Plaintiffs’ counsel from her email account by using her password without
her consent. (Id.) Additionally, on June 24, 2015, Wessam Aldeeb required
Pacheco to enter the password to her email account so that he could write an email
to Pacheco’s attorneys. (Id. ¶ 8.) Pacheco believed she needed to cooperate in
order to receive her paycheck, and allowed Wessam Aldeeb to send an email on
her behalf asking to dismiss her claims. (Id.; Dkt. # 69-4, Ex. D at 6).
Finally, Todd, Pacheco, and Ibarra2 all state that in the spring of this
year, Defendants began requiring employees to sign a waiver in order to receive
their paychecks. (Todd Decl. ¶ 8; Pacheco Decl. ¶ 9; “Ibarra Decl.,” Dkt. # 68-2
¶ 3.) Ibarra and Todd know of coworkers who refused to sign the waiver and were
subsequently not given their paychecks for several days. (Todd Decl. ¶ 9; Ibarra
Decl. ¶ 4.) Defendants have also submitted an employment contract that they
2

Ibarra worked for Defendants’ Marble Slab Creamery franchises from November
2015 until June 2015. (Ibarra Decl. ¶ 2.)
5

required all of their employees to sign after the lawsuit commenced. (Dkt. # 69 at
5–6; Dkt. # 69-3, Ex. C.) The contract requires employees to represent that, as of
the date of execution, the employee was properly compensated for all hours
worked, is owed no overtime pay, and has never been required to work “off the
clock,” each of which are factual allegations at issue in this action. (Dkt. # 69-3,
Ex. C ¶ 7; Dkt. # 64. ¶¶ 37–42.) The contract also requires employees to bring
disputes regarding compensation to the employer before seeking legal counsel.
(Id. ¶ 6.)
DISCUSSION
Because class actions present special opportunities for abuse, courts
have broad authority to govern the conduct of both counsel and parties in FLSA
collective actions. Belt v. Emcare, Inc., 299 F. Supp. 2d 664, 667 (E.D. Tex. 2003)
(citing Hoffman-La Roche Inc. v. Sperling, 493 U.S. 165, 171 (1989)). This
authority includes the power to restrict communication between a party and absent
class members. Gulf Oil Co. v. Bernard, 452 U.S. 89, 100 (1981). The court’s
discretion in this area, however, is “not unlimited.” Id. The Supreme Court has
explained that “an order limiting communications between parties and potential
class members should be based on a clear record and specific findings that reflect a
weighing of the need for a limitation and the potential interference with the rights
of the parties.” Id. at 101. Furthermore, district courts may not restrict
6

communication “without a specific record showing by the moving party of the
particular abuses by which it is threatened.” Id. at 102 (quoting Coles v. Marsh,
560 F.2d 186, 189 (3d Cir. 1977)).3
Courts consider four factors to determine whether good cause exists to
restrict ex parte communications tending to discourage absent class members from
joining the suit: the severity and likelihood of the perceived harm, the precision
with which the order is drawn, the availability of a less onerous alternative, and the
duration of the order. Belt, 299 F. Supp. 2d at 668 (citing Kleiner v. First Nat’l
Bank of Atlanta, 751 F.2d 1193, 1206 (11th Cir. 1985) and Hampton Hardware
Inc. v. Cotter & Co., Inc., 156 F.R.D. 630, 633 (N.D. Tex. 1994)). Courts “have
found a need to limit communications with absent class members where the
communications were misleading, coercive, or an improper attempt to . . .
encourag[e] class members not to join the suit.” Id. at 667–68. “Speech between
parties with an ongoing business relationship is inherently conducive to coercive
influence, and an employer-employee relationship is a salient example of this type
of ongoing business relationship.” Castillo v. Hernandez, No. EP-10-CV-247-KC,
2011 WL 1528792, at *3 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2011) (citations omitted).

3

Although Gulf Oil dealt with the Rule 23 class action context, the same concerns
and considerations apply to § 216(b) FLSA cases. Hoffman-La Roche, 493 U.S. at
171.
7

Here, there is ample evidence that Defendants have improperly
discouraged their employees from joining this suit, and have further attempted to
use their influence as employers to force plaintiffs who have joined to the suit to
drop their claims. Plaintiffs’ evidence establishes that Defendants have
conditioned the delivery of paychecks to current employees on the employees’
agreement to represent that they have no claims against Defendants, offered an
employee a raise in exchange for telling Plaintiffs’ counsel that he wished to
dismiss his claims, written emails on behalf of employees to Plaintiffs’ counsel
asking that their claims be dismissed, and offered to pay an employee to persuade
other plaintiffs to dismiss their claims. By Defendants’ own admission, after
commencement of this suit, they required all of their employees to sign an
agreement representing that they had been “fully and properly compensated” for all
hours worked and requiring them to bring compensation disputes to Defendants
before seeking legal counsel.
While Defendants’ Response levels a variety of accusations at the
declarants and Plaintiffs’ counsel, Defendants have submitted no evidence to
support their allegations. These allegations include that Plaintiffs’ attorneys have
improperly solicited employees to opt in to this suit, that the three declarants were
“involved in a conspiracy and practice of taking money from the cash drawers,”
that Ibarra is “wanted” by the police for stealing from a cash drawer, and that
8

Pacheco’s claims are brought in bad faith. None of these assertions are supported
by any competent evidence, and appear to be an attempt to distract from
Defendants’ own misconduct. Defendants have submitted an email from
Plaintiffs’ counsel denying any improper solicitation of potential class members;
Plaintiffs’ objections to a request for production; communications ostensibly from
Pacheco and Todd asking Plaintiffs’ counsel to dismiss their claims (which each
has declared to be a result of Defendants’ coercion); and the employment
agreement, described above, that Defendants required their employees to sign after
this suit commenced. This evidence provides no support for Defendants’
allegations, is consistent with the testimony of Plaintiffs’ declarants, and in the
case of the employment agreement, strongly supports Plaintiffs’ claims that
Defendants have improperly attempted to discourage and prevent potential class
members from joining this suit.
In light of this evidence, the Court finds good cause to enjoin
Defendants from engaging in any ex parte communication with plaintiffs or class
members regarding the subject matter of this action while the litigation is ongoing.
See Castillo, 2011 WL 1528762, at *7–8 (prohibiting defendants from
communicating with plaintiff employees about the subject matter of a FLSA case
where defendants sent letters inquiring into plaintiffs’ immigration status and
threatened a plaintiff with a lawsuit); Belt, 299 F. Supp. 2d at 669 (enjoining
9

defendants from making ex parte communications with class members where
defendants sent letter mischaracterizing the action and the available remedies); cf.
Burrell v. Crown Cent. Petroleum, Inc., 176 F.R.D. 239, 244 (E.D. Tex. 1997)
(refusing to enjoin a class action defendant from engaging in commercial speech
with its employees where the evidence showed defendant’s communications were
not misleading or coercive). To correct the prejudice caused by Defendants’
conduct, the Court will allow Plaintiffs to send the corrective notice attached to
this Order to all class members by U.S. mail. The corrective notice shall also be
posted by Defendants at their places of business in a location visible to employees.
Defendants shall bear the cost of sending the corrective notice, and must further
pay Plaintiffs’ reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in bringing this Motion. 4 Class
members shall have an additional 45 days from the date of this Order to file their
notices of consent to join this suit.
CONCLUSION
The Court, for the foregoing reasons, GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Protective Order, Corrective Notice, and Sanctions, and ORDERS that:

4

To establish the amount of reasonable attorneys’ fees owed by Defendants,
Plaintiffs shall submit a motion, supported by affidavits and other appropriate
documentation, setting out its reasonable attorneys’ fees related to this matter.
10

1.

Defendants and their counsel are prohibited from making any ex parte
communications with plaintiffs or class members regarding this action
until the action has concluded;

2.

Plaintiffs’ counsel are authorized to send by U.S. mail the corrective
notice attached to this Order within thirty (30) days of the entry of this
Order;

3.

Defendants shall bear the cost of mailing the corrective notice within
seven (7) days of the date that Plaintiffs’ counsel provide Defendants’
counsel with an invoice showing the cost of such mailing;

4.

Defendants shall post, within three (3) business days after the entry of
this Order, the corrective notice attached to this Order, in English and
Spanish, at each of Defendants’ Subway, Marble Slab Creamery, and
Great American Cookies stores in Bexar and Kendall Counties,
including but not limited to the locations at the Shops at La Cantera,
North Star Mall, Westover Hills Shopping Center, and Legacy
Shopping Center. Defendants shall post the notices in locations to
which all employees have access;

5.

Defendants, within seven (7) days of posting the corrective notices,
shall certify to the Court in writing that they have posted the notices.

11

Defendants may remove the posted notices thirty (30) days after the
entry of this Order;
6.

All opt-in plaintiffs shall have until forty-five (45) days after the entry
of this Order to file their Notices of Consent to Join this suit; and

7.

Defendants shall pay Plaintiffs’ reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in
bringing the Motion for Protective Order, Corrective Notice, and
Sanctions. Plaintiffs shall file a motion, supported by appropriate
evidence, for reasonable attorneys’ fees in this matter, to which
Defendants will have an opportunity to respond.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: San Antonio, Texas, September 1, 2015.

_____________________________________
David Alan Ezra
Senior United States Distict Judge

12

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CURRENT AND FORMER
EMPLOYEES OF FOOD SERVICE FRANCHISES (INCLUDING SUBWAY, MARBLE SLAB
CREAMERY, AND GREAT AMERICAN COOKIES FRANCHISES) OPERATED BY WESSAM
ALDEEB, ERSAN ALDEEB, AND SAADIA RACHIK
1) You have the right to participate in this lawsuit even if you have signed a
release of your claims.
2) Your employer is prohibited by law from threatening or coercing you to keep
you from participating in this lawsuit.
3) Your employer is also prohibited from retaliating against you for participating
in this lawsuit.
If you worked for food service franchises (including Subway, Marble Slab Creamery, or Great American
Cookies franchises located at places including the Shops at La Cantera, North Star Mall, Westover Hills
Shopping Center, and Legacy Shopping Center) operated by Wessam Aldeeb, Ersan Aldeeb, and Saadia
Rachik at any time between [insert date three years before date of Court’s order] and today, YOU MAY BE
ENTITLED TO JOIN A LAWSUIT FOR UNPAID WAGES AND MONEY DAMAGES.
1. Why are you getting this notice? What is this lawsuit about?
Former food service employees, including Maximiliano Lopez and Carol Buchanan (“the Plaintiffs”) initially
brought this lawsuit on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated against Wessam Aldeeb, Ersan
Aldeeb, Saadia Rachik and several entities that operated franchise establishments under names including Subway,
Marble Slab Creamery, and Great American Cookies located at places including the Shops at La Cantera, North
Star Mall, Westover Hills Shopping Center, and Legacy Shopping Center (“the Defendants”). The Plaintiffs claim
that they regularly had to perform work tasks but they were not paid for all of their work time. The Plaintiffs also
claim that they were not paid one and one half times their hourly rate (“overtime”) for all hours worked over 40 in a
work week.
The Defendants deny the Plaintiffs’ claims. The Court has not decided who is right.
2. You may be able to make a claim in the lawsuit if:
•
•

You worked as a food service worker for the Defendants at any time between [insert date three years
before date of Court’s order] and today;
You worked more than forty (40) hours in a week and were not compensated for all hours worked or were
not paid one and one half times your regular rate of pay (“overtime”) for all hours worked over 40 in a
work week.

3. What are your options?
If you want to make a claim for unpaid wages in this case, you may mail the attached Consent to Join form and
informational sheet to Plaintiffs’ attorneys at the address below. If you mail a Consent to Join form to Plaintiffs’
attorneys on time, you will be part of the case, and will agree to be represented by Plaintiffs’ attorneys. You may
also obtain an attorney of your own choosing (at your own expense), who can file your Consent to Join with the
Court. If the Plaintiffs lose, you will receive nothing. If you join this lawsuit, you may or may not be required to
This is a Court Notice, Not an Advertisement from a Lawyer.

provide records, answer written questions, testify under oath, or any combination of these things. If the Plaintiffs
win or settle the case, you may receive money from the Defendants. If the Plaintiffs lose, you will receive nothing.
Your decision not to join this lawsuit will not affect any rights you may have to pursue claims on your own.
However, the legal time limit to make a claim is running. You have the right to participate in this claim
regardless of your immigration status and no one will be permitted to inquire about your immigration status
in this case. The Defendants may not retaliate against you or mistreat you in any way for joining this lawsuit.
The law prohibits anyone from discriminating or retaliating against you if you choose to take part in this
case. This means that you should not be fired, demoted, or have your pay cut because you participate in this
case.
You have the right to join this lawsuit even if you already signed a statement denying that you are owed
anything.
If you want to join the lawsuit and make a claim for unpaid wages, your signed Consent to Join form must
be postmarked, emailed or faxed to either or both of the attorneys listed below by [insert date 60 days after
the date of the Court’s order]
If you do not wish to join, you do not have to do anything.
4. How can you get more information?
You can get more information by calling the Plaintiffs’ attorneys or any attorney of your choosing. The Plaintiffs’
attorneys are:
EQUAL JUSTICE CENTER
PHILIP J. MOSS
8301 Broadway Street, Suite 309
San Antonio, Texas 78209
Teléfono: [phone] ext. 102
Fax: [phone]
Dirección de correo electrónico:
[e-mail]
Se habla Español / Spanish spoken

CONSENT TO JOIN FLSA OVERTIME LAWSUIT
I understand that I may be eligible to join the action filed by Maximiliano Lopez and Carol Buchanan (“Named
Plaintiffs”) to recover unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs from food service
franchises (including Subway, Marble Slab Creamery, or Great American Cookies franchises located at
places including the Shops at La Cantera, North Star Mall, Westover Hills Shopping Center, and Legacy
Shopping Center), operated by Wessam Aldeeb, Ersan Aldeeb, and Saadia Rachik (the “Defendants”).
By filing this consent, I understand that I designate the Named Plaintiffs, hereinafter the “Representative
Plaintiffs,” as my agents to make decisions on my behalf concerning this Fair Labor Standards Act lawsuit
against Defendants including the method and manner of conducting this lawsuit, entering into settlement
agreements, entering into agreements with Representative Plaintiffs' attorneys, and all other matters
pertaining to Fair Labor Standards Act Litigation against Defendants. These decisions and agreements made
and entered into by the Representative Plaintiffs will be binding on me if I sign this consent.
I understand that Representative Plaintiffs have entered into a Representation Agreement (“Agreement”) with
the law firm of the Equal Justice Center which applies to all plaintiffs who file this consent. If I sign this
consent, I agree to be bound by such Agreement. I further understand that I may obtain a copy of the
Agreement by requesting it from Representative Plaintiffs’ attorneys.
I agree and understand that the Equal J ustice Center and/or the Representative Plaintiffs may in the future
appoint other individuals to be Representative Plaintiffs in Fair Labor Standards Act Litigation against
Defendants. I consent to such appointment and agree to be bound by the decisions of such new
Representative Plaintiff(s) for all purposes related to Fair Labor Standards Act Litigation against
Defendants. I further acknowledge that this consent is intended to be filed to recover my overtime wages
against Defendants whether in the action with the Named Plaintiffs or in any subsequent action that may be
filed on my behalf for such recovery. This consent may be used in this case or in any subsequent case as
necessary.
By choosing to file this consent, I understand that I will be bound by the judgment of the Court. I will also be
bound by, and will share in, any settlement that may be negotiated on behalf of all Plaintiffs.
I consent to join in the action to recover my unpaid wages and overtime.

Signature

Printed Name

Date

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
This information will not be made part of any public record and is necessary for
your attorney’s files for litigation and possible settlement purposes.
Name:________________________________________________________
Any other Name(s) used or known by:
_____________________________________________________________
Street Address: ________________________________________________
Mailing Address: _______________________________________________
City, State & Zip Code: __________________________________________
Daytime Telephone: _____________________________________________
Evening Telephone: _____________________________________________
Cellular Telephone: _____________________________________________
E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________
Return these forms to:
Philip J. Moss
Equal Justice Center
8301 Broadway Street, Suite 309
San Antonio, Texas 78209

AVISO IMPORTANTE PARA LOS EMPLEADOS ACTUALES Y EX EMPLEADOS DE
FRANQUICIAS DE SERVICIO DE ALIMENTOS (INCLUYENDO FRANQUICIAS SUBWAY,
MARBLE SLAB CREAMERY Y GREAT AMERICAN COOKIES) OPERADAS POR WESSAM
ALDEEB, ERSAN ALDEEB, Y SAADIA RACHIK
1) Usted tiene el derecho a participar en esta demanda incluso si ha firmado una
liberación de sus reclamaciones.
2) Su empleador está prohibido por ley de amenazar o forzar a usted para
impedir que participe en esta demanda.
3) Su empleador también tiene prohibido tomar represalias contra usted por
participar en esta demanda.
Si usted trabajó para franquicias de servicio de alimentos (incluyendo franquicias Subway, Marble Slab
Creamery, o Great American Cookies ubicadas en lugares incluyendo las Tiendas de la Cantera, el Centro
Comercial North Star, el Centro Comercial Westover Hills, y Centro Comercial Legacy) operadas por Wessam
Aldeeb, Ersan Aldeeb y Saadia Rachik en cualquier momento entre el [añadir fecha tres años antes de la fecha
de la orden de la corte], y hoy, USTED PODRÍA TENER DERECHO A UNIRSE A UNA DEMANDA POR
SUELDOS NO PAGADOS Y DAÑOS DE DINERO.
1. ¿Por qué está usted recibiendo este aviso? ¿De qué se trata esta demanda?
Ex empleados de servicio de alimentos, incluyendo Maximiliano López y Carol Buchanan ("los Demandantes")
inicialmente interpusieron esta demanda de parte de ellos mismos y todas las personas en la misma situación contra
Wessam Aldeeb, Ersan Aldeeb, Saadia Rachik y varias entidades que operaron establecimientos de franquicias bajo
nombres incluyendo Subway, Marble Slab Creamery, y Great American Cookies ubicadas en lugares incluyendo
las Tiendas de la Cantera, el Centro Comercial North Star, el Centro Comercial Westover Hills, y Centro Comercial
Legacy (“los Demandados”). Los Demandantes alegan que regularmente tenían que realizar tareas de trabajo pero
no se les pagaba por todo su tiempo de trabajo. Los Demandantes alegan también que no se les pagaba tiempo y
medio (1.5) de su tasa de pago regular ("overtime") por todas las horas trabajadas de más de 40 en una semana de
trabajo.
Los Demandados niegan las reclamaciones de los Demandantes. La Corte no ha decidido quién tiene la razón.
2. Usted podría hacer una reclamación en este caso si:
•
•

Usted trabajó como trabajador(a) de servicio de alimentos para los Demandados en cualquier momento
entre el [añadir fecha tres años antes de la fecha de la orden de la corte], y hoy;
Usted trabajo más de cuarenta (40) horas en una semana y no le pagaron por todas las horas trabajadas o no
se le pago tiempo y medio de su tasa de pago regular (“overtime”) por todas las horas trabajadas de más de
40 en una semana de trabajo.

3. ¿Cuáles son sus opciones?
Si usted desea reclamar por los salarios no pagados en este caso, usted puede enviar por correo el formulario de
Consentimiento para Unirse a la Demanda y la hoja de información adjuntos a los abogados de los Demandantes a

la dirección que aparece abajo. Si usted envía su formulario de Consentimiento para Unirse a la Demanda a los
abogados de los Demandantes a tiempo, será parte del caso, y está de acuerdo de ser representado por los abogados
de los Demandantes. Usted también puede obtener un abogado de su elección (los gastos corriendo por su propia
cuenta), quién pueda presentar su Consentimiento para Unirse a la Demanda con la corte. Si los Demandantes
pierden, usted no recibirá nada. Si usted se une a esta demanda, puede o no puede que se le requiera proveer
records, contestar preguntas escritas, dar su testimonio jurado, o una combinación de estas cosas. Si los
Demandantes ganan o resuelven el caso, usted podría recibir dinero adicional de los Demandados. Si los
Demandantes pierden, usted no recibirá nada. Su decisión de no unirse a esta demanda no afectará cualquier
derecho que pueda tener para perseguir reclamaciones por su cuenta. Sin embargo, el plazo legal para hacer una
reclamación está corriendo. Usted tiene el derecho a participar en esta demanda sin importar su estatus
migratorio y no se permitirá preguntar sobre su estatus migratorio en este caso. Los Demandados no pueden
tomar represalias contra usted o maltratarlo(a) de cualquier manera por unirse a esta demanda. La ley
prohíbe cualquier discriminación o represalias contra usted si usted decide formar parte en este caso. Esto
significa que usted no debe ser despedido, degradado, o que se le reduzca su sueldo porque usted participa en
este caso.
Usted tiene el derecho a unirse a esta demanda incluso si ya firmó una declaración negando que se le deba
nada.
Si usted desea unirse a la demanda y hacer una reclamación por salarios no pagados, debe enviarnos su
formulario de Consentimiento para Unirse a la Demanda firmado con sello de correos, por correo
electrónico o por fax a uno o ambos de los abogados que aparecen abajo a más tardar para el [añadir fecha
60 días de la fecha de la orden de la corte].
Si usted no desea unirse a la demanda, simplemente no haga nada.
4. ¿Cómo puede obtener más información?
Usted puede obtener más información llamando a los abogados de los Demandantes o a cualquier abogado que
usted escoja. Los abogados de los Demandantes son:
EQUAL JUSTICE CENTER
PHILIP J. MOSS
8301 Broadway Street, Suite 309
San Antonio, Texas 78209
Teléfono: [phone] ext. 102
Fax: [phone]
Dirección de correo electrónico:
[e-mail]
Se habla Español / Spanish spoken

CONSENTIMIENTO PARA UNIRSE A LA DEMANDA DE LA LEY DE NORMAS JUSTAS DE
TRABAJO (FLSA – SIGLAS EN INGLÉS) SOBRE HORAS EXTRAS
Yo entiendo que puedo ser elegible a unirme a la demanda presentada por Maximiliano López y Carol
Buchanan ("Demandantes Nombrados") para recuperar los salarios no pagados por horas extras, daños y
perjuicios, honorarios de abogados y costos de las franquicias de servicio de alimentos (incluyendo
Subway, Marble Slab Creamery, o Great American Cookies ubicadas en lugares incluyendo las
Tiendas de la Cantera, el Centro Comercial North Star, el Centro Comercial Westover Hills, y
Centro Comercial Legacy) operadas por Wessam Aldeeb, Ersan Aldeeb, y Saadia Rachik (los
"Demandados").
Con la presentación de este consentimiento, yo entiendo que designo a los Demandantes Nombrados, en
lo sucesivo los "Demandantes Representantes," como mis agentes para tomar decisiones de mi parte con
respecto a esta demanda bajo la Ley de Normas Justas de Trabajo (FLSA) contra los Demandados
incluyendo el método y la manera de llevar a cabo esta demanda, entrar en acuerdos extrajudiciales, entrar
en acuerdos con los abogados de los Demandantes Representantes, y todos los demás asuntos
relacionados con la Ley de Normas Justas de Trabajo en contra de los Demandados. Estas decisiones y
acuerdos alcanzados y suscritos por los Demandantes Representantes me obligarán a mí si firmo este
consentimiento.
Yo entiendo que los Demandantes Representantes han llegado a un Acuerdo de Representación
("Acuerdo") con la firma de abogados del Equal Justice Center que aplica a todos los demandantes que
presenten este consentimiento. Si firmo este consentimiento, estoy de acuerdo en ser obligado(a) por
dicho Acuerdo. Además, entiendo que puedo obtener una copia del Acuerdo solicitándola a los abogados
de los Demandantes Representantes.
Yo estoy de acuerdo y entiendo que el Equal Justice Center y/o los Demandantes Representantes podrán
designar en el futuro a otras personas a ser Demandantes Representantes en el Litigio bajo la Ley de
Normas Justas de Trabajo contra los Demandados. Yo doy mi consentimiento a dicho nombramiento y
acepto que quedaré obligado(a) a las decisiones de cualquier Demandante Representante(s) nuevo con
respecto a todos los efectos relacionados con la Ley de Litigios bajo la ley de Normas Justas de Trabajo
en contra los Demandados. Además, reconozco que el propósito de este consentimiento es de presentar
una demanda para recuperar mi pago de horas extras contra los Demandados, ya sea en la demanda con
los Demandantes Nombrados o en cualquier demanda posterior que se pueda presentar en mi nombre para
dicha recuperación. Este consentimiento puede ser utilizado en este caso o en cualquier caso posterior
según sea necesario.
Al optar por presentar este consentimiento, yo entiendo que voy a estar obligado(a) por la decisión de la
corte. También voy a estar sujeto(a), y participaré, en cualquier arreglo que se pueda negociar en nombre
de todos los Demandantes.
Doy mi consentimiento para participar en la demanda.
________________________________
Firma
________________________________
Nombre en letra de molde

__________________
Fecha

POR FAVOR ESCRIBA EN LETRA DE MOLDE O A MÁQUINA LA SIGUIENTE
INFORMACIÓN:
Esta información no formará parte de ningún archivo público pero es necesaria para el expediente de su
abogado para propósito del litigio y un posible acuerdo.
Nombre: __________________________________________________________
Cualquier otro nombre(s) que usa o por el cuál es conocido:
__________________________________________________________________
Dirección: _________________________________________________________
Dirección postal: ____________________________________________________
Ciudad, Estado & Código Postal:
__________________________________________________________________
Teléfono durante el día: ______________________________________________
Teléfono en la noche: ________________________________________________
Teléfono celular: ____________________________________________________
Dirección de correo electrónico:
__________________________________________________________________
Envíe de vuelta estos formularios a: Philip J. Moss
Equal Justice Center
8301 Broadway Street, Suite 309
San Antonio, Texas 78209