Mai Larsen Designs v. Want2Scrap, LLC, et al

Filing 81

ORDER Clarifying Order #73. Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (rg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
MAI LARSEN DESIGNS,

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Plaintiff,
vs.
WANT2SCRAP, LLC, MICHELLE
PARRISH, CREATIVE SCRAP
DESIGNS,
Defendants.

CIVIL NO.
SA-17-CV-1084-ESC

ORDER
On March 27, 2019, the Court issued an order [#73] granting Defendants/CounterPlaintiffs Want2Scrap, LLC, and Michele Parrish’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents
or, in the Alternative, Motion for Sanctions [#53] and denying Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Mai
Larsen Designs and Counter-Defendants Mabel Larsen and Creative Scrap Designs’ Motion to
Compel Production of Documents or, in the Alternative, Motion for Sanctions [#60]. Because
Order #73 referred to Defendants’ motion to compel by the wrong docket number, the docket
text for Clerk’s docket entry associated with Order #73 incorrectly stated that Defendants’
motion to compel [#53] was denied and Plaintiffs’ motion to compel [#60] was granted.
Consistent with the Court’s oral rulings, the Court clarifies that the Court’s March 27, 2019,
Order [#73] grants Defendants’ motion to compel [#53] and denies Plaintiffs’ motion to compel
[#60].
SIGNED this 5th day of April, 2019.

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1

2