Castro v. Kory et al

Filing 35

ORDER --IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties submit any documents for in camera inspection, as set forth in the undersigneds order dated May 24, 2021 [#33], on or before June 9, 2021,. Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (mgr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION JOSE CASTRO, Plaintiff, vs. KIMBERLY KORY, MICHAEL THORNTON, CARL KERAWALLA, SHAWN KING, UNKNOWN SAN ANTONIO POLICE OFFICER(S), Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § SA-20-CV-01022-XR ORDER Before the Court is the above-styled cause of action. The record reflects that the District Court referred Defendants’ Motion to Quash and for Protective Order on April 29, 2019. On May 21, 2021, the undersigned held a hearing on the motion, after which it entered an Order memorializing the parties’ resolution as to certain issues and denying the motion as to the items remaining in dispute [#33]. At the hearing, the parties agreed to submit certain documents to the undersigned for in camera inspection. To date, the Court has not received any documents for review. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties submit any documents for in camera inspection, as set forth in the undersigned’s order dated May 24, 2021 [#33], on or before June 9, 2021, by e-mailing the documents to valeria_sandoval@txwd.uscourts.gov. If the parties have reached further resolution and an in camera inspection is no longer required, they are directed to file an Advisory within this same time period, informing the Court of the same. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 3rd day of June, 2021. ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?