Clay-Acevedo v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 9 Report and Recommendations, Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (vl)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

ALEJANDRO EMANUEL CLAYACEVEDO,

Plaintiff,
V.

§
§
§
§
§
§

§
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS INC.,
Defendant.

CIVIL NO.SA-24-CV-621-OLG

§
§
§
§
ORDER

The Court has considered United States Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer's Report and
Recommendation (the "Recommendation")(Dkt. No. 9), wherein Judge Fairer recommends that

this action be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b)and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). See Dkt. No.9 at 1, 4. A

copy of the Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff via certified mail on January 16, 2025, and
returned as unclaimed on February 14, 2025. See Dkt. Nos. 10-11. To date, no objections have
been filed.

When no party objects to a magistrate judge's recommendation,the Court need not conduct
a de novo review of the entire record. See U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)("A judge of the court shall make a

de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and

recommendation to which objection is made."); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Rather, the Court
need only review the magistrate judge's recommendation to determine whether it is clearly
erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219,1221 (5th Cir. 1989).

After reviewing the Recommendation, the Court concludes that it is correct. Accordingly,
the Recommendation (Dkt. No.9)is ACCEPTED and,for the reasons set forth therein, this case
is DISMISSED.