Snyder v. Dillard et al

Filing 53

Plaintiff's Explanation of his 50 Motion for De Novo Review from Troy Snyder. (ad, )

c

+ATS

4

CD\vi

ic_________
(IJAC
Dr-tjicio-'J

;j Q
o4-Tc

Q;

FILED
APR 1 3 2012
CLERK, U.S t
T
WESTERN
STR
BY
PUTY CLERK

TX
c:o.

D,4t)

-R

X150-

af

E

P2ATJTLf

OAL-

TE

5P6F

D

o

+0

po
o

S

,bt

jiouc

C&LLT&

r\;

pSoR

c

)-

Cos;ô

up

+0

O94-

OO

vSQb

3k

s,

copct

ii

c -/o

NOT AL-LoL

Rco)

RQp

of ec
c.c,

o

of 3

c

fo

2

;rckr

OJt/

i-o

L-

A)

{- T-;s

; -'1

ru0J,

çsc
ORtR

s

a

o\CcQS

4k

ROs'--N,-rX

'1QR

rt

N\ft

--L

sf

o4WS

r'L

-D- A1

3

-

b4(DJ

cvc

lkQ

-v1

c1'0k

*S

LL-

Mps

or

/'\AQ ,vQc cVOA
O'
L'c 4LQ
3'-

P

,

Qv

A-TFRAJATTIV &,

tiT

tVD

'

7?53 77O
vcQft +o

(

T:A) Tç

-S

Ffv\

çor;c-'I too

i-'V

-iks

i'-;s

ON

D

°

Ol

cYV'IO\L

orQpovQ

D

Lcvi L

i-r, QR

4k

jo
4L

IL\T

tr

k
(.o4SQL
tca
4c

t;s

a.)O¼.

-si'i

Ps

4$

cc,

''I1
1OJ to

m-s Cort.
EFCSE,

O

UclO

kQ

jOfrQii\y

ooJS

P\a;'i-cs

f
1-5

foltY'

40

1k-it ko1'?

(jJ

S\

Si

P,-e.AtSQS

Co

CV

°'
+0

Co(QS

\JCXtO
Co1,

QvQ,
+0

fr\y(R

Cu5t

coct&s
uf

Losf D'D

fo

of

çr
J

c--J A'TD,

10

ofr-ucLo")

c

AiOtQ

\S

,4'\1)L1

O

',ô-t+ Co'VSeL

v1bI2.. A1b

iL_

Oc-

4o

'r

iQ(

-'

10

4tS
P
REP6iFc\tYx' JJ\o'JFi A,t PAE-D F°P.
*b

Lf

rcpty

/A->9a'i L%4J
ic3t
'-5'' I (AJZT

Q4,

A

t$

Qv

ro/L) s-i0ç
iCXQG
ft--o

c

LrN

t

4k

(\oc F,A\

ccc,

?)O
c L4J,4ij atJ

q(

pe

of

A1'-

ckJa

-t\q

p5
ct'

o

ckI

rfrL

CQt

L) ctiJ

Apr L

CQcA.
;s4

ct-:j4

o

A

L

CoQc.t

k

of

rvc
i co-'-d
Lc v

,

1OQf
3

II 'I

Ili

11

f1

ll''t

f1

11t! 'I

tE.:E:

!I

TOL
''

\'VOQ

'

1771'

S'\7

i:

c)\t'&)

oo,

-cc1

0
3

:ç

OLL
.

:

i::

S

(

t

L

S

cIoJ.:rL