Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al v. Promate Electronic Co., LTD., et al

Filing 141

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 139 Motion to Approve Consent Judgment, filed by Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co., Ltd., Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., 140 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (sm3)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISION
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS,
INC., A DELAWARE
CORPORATION; AND CHENGDU
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS
CO., LTD., A CHINESE
CORPORATION;
Plaintiffs,
v.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

6:20-CV-00876-ADA

PROMATE ELECTRONIC CO., LTD.,
A TAIWANESE CORPORATION;
QINGMI (BEIJING) TECHNOLOGY
CO., LTD., SHENZHEN TIMES
INNOVATION TECHNOLOGY CO.
LTD.,
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Derek T. Gilliland. ECF No. 140. The report recommends that this Court grant the Parties’ Joint
Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment (ECF No. 139). Id. The report and recommendation was
filed on April 4, 2023.
A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations
of the magistrate judge within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report and
recommendation, thereby securing de novo review by the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed.
R. Civ. P. 72(b). As of today, neither party has filed objections.
When no objections are timely filed, a district court reviews the magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note (“When no
timely objection is filed, the [district] court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on

the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). The Court has reviewed the report
and recommendation and finds no clear error.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Gilliland (ECF No. 140) is ADOPTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Consent
Judgment (ECF No. 139) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
1. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action as well as personal jurisdiction
over STIT.
2. Venue is proper in this judicial district.
3. Plaintiffs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co.,
Ltd. are the owners of the Asserted Patents.
4. The Asserted Patents are valid and enforceable.
5. Upon inducement by Meraki, STIT imported into the United States and sold certain
models of the STIT Accused Products including without limitation the Baseus Compact Quick
Charger U+C 20W, Baseus Super Si Quick Charger 1C 25W, the Baseus GaN2 100W Fast Charger
incorporating certain Meraki components accused of infringement, including without limitation
the MK91736 and MK91808.
6. STIT does not contest the STIT Accused Products infringe at least one claim of each of
the Asserted Patents.
7. STIT, and its agents, representatives, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, and related
companies, employees, and those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive
actual notice of this Order are hereby permanently enjoined from making, using, selling, offering

for sale, or importing into the United States the Accused Products, any merely colorable variations
thereof, and any STIT products incorporating such Accused Products or variations, including
without limitation the STIT Accused Products without a license.
8. MPS’s claims against STIT for infringement of the Asserted Patents are dismissed with
prejudice.
9. For all costs and attorneys’ fees for this action, each party will bear its own costs and
fees.
10. No other or further relief is granted to any party.
11. The parties affirmatively waive any and all rights to appeal this Final Consent Judgment
and Permanent Injunction.
12. No just reason for delay prevents entry of this Final Consent Judgment and Permanent
Injunction.
13. The Court retains jurisdiction over this Final Consent Judgment and Permanent
Injunction for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the terms hereof.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
SIGNED this 2nd day of June, 2023.

ALAN D ALBRIGHT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE