Patel v. Drozd et al
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, granting 9 and 10 and authorizing deposit into the Court's Registry. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISION
AARTI PATEL,
§
§
§
v.
§
§
IVAN M DROZD, K&D MASONRY, INC., §
and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
§
§
Defendant.
Plaintiff,
6:23-CV-00676-ADA-JCM
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Jeffery C. Manske (ECF No. 15) regarding Plaintiff Aarti Patel’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(ECF No. 9) and Defendant The United States of America’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 10). The Report and Recommendation RECOMMENDS that both motions be GRANTED.
This report and recommendation was filed on September 30, 2024.
A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations
of the magistrate judge within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report and
recommendation, thereby securing de novo review by the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed.
R. Civ. P. 72(b). As of today, neither party has filed objections.
When no objections are timely filed, a district court reviews the magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 Advisory Committee’s Note (“When
no timely objection is filed, the [district] court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). The Court has reviewed the
report and recommendation and finds no clear error.
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Manske (ECF No. 15) is ADOPTED. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that ECF
Nos. 9 and 10 are GRANTED.
In GRANTING Patel's request, it is ORDERED that the Clerk, United States District
Court, shall receive and deposit into the Court's registry a Cashier's check in the amount of
$33,243.16, which represents the amount The United States is entitled to of the excess
funds. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk, United States District Court, as soon as
the business of allows, shall deposit these monies into the disputed ownership fund of the
Court Registry Investment System (CRIS) where they shall remain until further order of the
court.
SIGNED this 23rd day of October, 2024.
ALAN D ALBRIGHT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?