Emrit v. Pratt et al
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 8 Report and Recommendations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the above styled and numbered cause is dismissed. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (cav)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISION
RONALD SATISH EMRIT,
Plaintiff,
v.
KARA PRATT, ATTORNEY; OFFICE
OF CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
OF TEXAS BAR, TEXAS BOARD OF
DISCIPLINARY APPEALS, TEXAS
BAR,
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL NO. W-24-CV-00102-ADA
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Jeffrey C. Manske. ECF No. 8. The report recommends that the above styled and numbered
cause be dismissed without prejudice. The report and recommendation was filed on April 24,
2024.
A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report
and recommendation, thereby securing de novo review by the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). As of today, neither party has filed objections.
When no objections are timely filed, a district court reviews the magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note (“When
no timely objection is filed, the [district] court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). The Court has reviewed the
report and recommendation and finds no clear error.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Manske (ECF No. 8) is ADOPTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the above styled and numbered cause is dismissed without prejudice.
SIGNED this 9th day of May, 2024.
ALAN D ALBRIGHT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?