Emrit v. Pratt et al

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 8 Report and Recommendations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the above styled and numbered cause is dismissed. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (cav)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff, v. KARA PRATT, ATTORNEY; OFFICE OF CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF TEXAS BAR, TEXAS BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS, TEXAS BAR, § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL NO. W-24-CV-00102-ADA Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. ECF No. 8. The report recommends that the above styled and numbered cause be dismissed without prejudice. The report and recommendation was filed on April 24, 2024. A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report and recommendation, thereby securing de novo review by the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). As of today, neither party has filed objections. When no objections are timely filed, a district court reviews the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note (“When no timely objection is filed, the [district] court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and finds no clear error. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Manske (ECF No. 8) is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the above styled and numbered cause is dismissed without prejudice. SIGNED this 9th day of May, 2024. ALAN D ALBRIGHT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?