Phillip M. Adams & Associates, L.L.C. v. Lenovo International et al

Filing 1794

AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 1774 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Patent Invalidity Based on Failure to Satisfy Written Description. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 9/29/2010. (las) Modified on 9/30/2010 added Amended text(las).

-DN Phillip M. Adams & Associates, L.L.C. v. Lenovo International et al

Doc. 1794

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH NORTHERN DIVISION

PHILLIP M. ADAMS & ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON PATENT INVALIDITY BASED ON FAILURE TO SATISFY W RITTEN DESCRIPTION

vs.

W INBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CORP., LTD, AND MSI COMPUTER CORP., et al., Defendants.

Case No. 1:05-CV-64 TS

Plaintiff moved for judgment as a matter of law on Defendants' claims for patent invalidity for the failure to satisfy the written description requirement. Defendants' response clarified that Defendants "assert that only claim 13 of the `222 patent lacks a written description under 35 U.S.C. section 112."1 For the reasons stated from the bench during trial on September 28, 2010, it is
1

Docket No. 1779 at 1 n.2. 1

Dockets.Justia.com

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law in favor of Adams and against all Defendants on failure to satisfy written description (Docket No. 1774) is DENIED. DATED September 29, 2010. BY THE COURT:

___________________________________ TED STEWART United States District Judge

2