Cox v. Cache County et al
Filing
170
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 168 Motion to Amend/Correct. Defendants must file their summary judgment motion regarding Plaintiffs third and fourth claims for relief by April 25, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 4/4/14. (jmr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION
DARREN E. COX,
COX HONEY OF UTAH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Case No. 1:08-cv-00124-CW-DBP
District Judge Clark Waddoups
CACHE COUNTY, a Utah municipal
corporation, et al.,
Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead
Defendants.
This matter was referred to the Court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). (Docket No. 168.)
Under the current scheduling order, the parties’ dispositive motion deadline expired on June 7,
2013. (Dkt. No. 124.) Defendants now move to amend the scheduling order. (Dkt. No. 168.)
They want to extend the dispositive motion deadline so that they may file a summary judgment
motion regarding Plaintiffs’ third and fourth claims for relief. (Id. at 2.)
Plaintiffs have not responded to Defendants’ motion, and the time to do so has expired. See
DUCivR 7-1(b)(3)(B). Given Plaintiffs’ failure to respond, the Court GRANTS Defendants’
motion. (Dkt. No. 168.) See DUCivR 7-1(d) (“Failure to respond timely to a motion may result
in the court’s granting the motion without further notice.”).
Page 1 of 2
Defendants must file their summary judgment motion regarding Plaintiffs’ third and fourth
claims for relief by April 25, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 4th day of April, 2014.
By the Court:
Dustin B. Pead
United States Magistrate Judge
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?