Cox v. Cache County et al

Filing 170

MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 168 Motion to Amend/Correct. Defendants must file their summary judgment motion regarding Plaintiffs third and fourth claims for relief by April 25, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 4/4/14. (jmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION DARREN E. COX, COX HONEY OF UTAH, Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM DECISION Case No. 1:08-cv-00124-CW-DBP District Judge Clark Waddoups CACHE COUNTY, a Utah municipal corporation, et al., Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendants. This matter was referred to the Court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). (Docket No. 168.) Under the current scheduling order, the parties’ dispositive motion deadline expired on June 7, 2013. (Dkt. No. 124.) Defendants now move to amend the scheduling order. (Dkt. No. 168.) They want to extend the dispositive motion deadline so that they may file a summary judgment motion regarding Plaintiffs’ third and fourth claims for relief. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiffs have not responded to Defendants’ motion, and the time to do so has expired. See DUCivR 7-1(b)(3)(B). Given Plaintiffs’ failure to respond, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. (Dkt. No. 168.) See DUCivR 7-1(d) (“Failure to respond timely to a motion may result in the court’s granting the motion without further notice.”). Page 1 of 2 Defendants must file their summary judgment motion regarding Plaintiffs’ third and fourth claims for relief by April 25, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 4th day of April, 2014. By the Court: Dustin B. Pead United States Magistrate Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?