A.W. et al v. Davis School District

Filing 23

ORDER granting 22 Motion to Dismiss ; dismissing 2 Complaint with prejudice ; denying as moot 13 Motion to Certify Class ; the Court hereby incorporates the terms of the Universal Settlement and Release of All Claims into this Order, and retains jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the terms of settlement agreement, as agreed to by the parties. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2); Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 37881 (1994); Morris v. City of Hobart, 39 F.3d 1105, 1110-11 (10th Cir. 1994); Floyd v. Ortiz, 300 F.3d 1223, 1226 & n.3 (10th Cir. 2002). Case Closed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 02/01/2013. (asp)

Download PDF
SCOTT D. CHENEY (6193) KYLE K. KAISER (13924) Assistant Utah Attorneys General JOHN E. SWALLOW (5802) Utah Attorney General 160 East 300 South, Sixth Floor PO BOX 140856 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-0856 Telephone: (801) 366-0100 E-mail: scheney@utah.gov E-mail: kkaiser@utah.gov JOHN MEJIA (13965) ACLU of Utah Foundation, Inc. 355 N. 300 W. Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 Telephone: (801) 521-9862 E-mail: jmejia@acluutah.org JOSHUA BLOCK ACLU Foundation, Inc. 125 Broad Street, Floor 18 New York, New York 10004 Telephone: (212) 549-2600 E-mail: jblock@aclu.org Attorney for Defendants Attorneys for Plaintiff *Admitted Pro Hac Vice IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH – NORTHERN DIVISION A.W. and C.W., by and through their mother Tina Weber, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, ORDER ON JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:12-cv-242-EJF DAVIS SCHOOL DISTRICT, Magistrate Judge Evelyn Furse Defendant. NOW before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice (doc. 22.) The parties advise that the matter has been settled through a Universal Settlement and Release of All Claims. They request that the case be dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs; for Defendant to pay Plaintiffs’ reasonable attorney fees as reflected in the settlement; that Plaintiffs’ Motion for class Certification (doc. 13) be denied as moot; and that the Court incorporate the terms of the Universal Settlement and Release of All Claims into its order of dismissal, retaining jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the agreement. Based on the parties’ agreement, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice (doc. 22) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs Proposed Class Action Complaint (doc. 2) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs, and with Defendants to pay Plaintiffs attorneys’ fees as agreed to in the Universal Settlement and Release of All Claims. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Action Certification (doc. 13) is DENIED AS MOOT. It is further ORDERED that the Court hereby incorporates the terms of the Universal Settlement and Release of All Claims into this Order, and retains jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the terms of settlement agreement, as agreed to by the parties. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2); Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 378–81 (1994); Morris v. City of Hobart, 39 F.3d 1105, 1110-11 (10th Cir. 1994); Floyd v. Ortiz, 300 F.3d 1223, 1226 & n.3 (10th Cir. 2002). The Clerk will CLOSE the case. IT IS SO ORDERED DATED this 1st day of February, 2013. Evelyn J. Furse United States Magistrate Judge District of Utah AGREED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT BY: Attorneys for Plaintiff: ___/s/ John Mejia________________ JOHN MEJIA ACLU of Utah Foundation, Inc. Joshua Block ACLU Foundation, Inc. Attorneys for Defendant: JOHN E. SWALLOW UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL /s/ Scott D. Cheney SCOTT D. CHENEY KYLE J. KAISER Assistant Utah Attorneys General Attorney for Defendant Electronic Signature affixed with the permission of Counsel for Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?