Memmott v. United of Omaha Life Insurance

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 11/1/13. (jlw)

Download PDF
FI 0 U.S. DISTRICT COURT 7un NOV - 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH NORTHERN DIVISION ':J 2: II 3 DISTRICT OF UTAH BY:-:::---:-c---:---_ DEPUTY Cl ER KAREN MEMMOTT, Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION vs. Case No. 1:13-CV-25 UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE CO., Judge Dee Benson Defendant. Before the court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse, recommending: (1) that the court construe Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint as one to recover benefits pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1 )(B); (2) that the court also construe Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint as one requesting declaratory judgment pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B); and (3) that the court order that Defendant have twentyone (21) days to answer Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint as construed as suggested above. The parties were notified oftheir rightto file objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days after receiving it. Neither party has filed such an objection. 1 i Having reviewed all relevant materials, including the reasoning set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the court hereby ORDERS follows: 1. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint shall be construed as one to recover benefits pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B); 2. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint shall also be construed as one requesting declaratory judgment pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B); 3. Defendant shall have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order to answer Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint as construed as suggested above; DATED this pI day of November, 2013. Dee Benson United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?