Prigge v. Woods Cross Police Department et al

Filing 9

ORDER adopting in part Report and Recommendations re 7 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff shall have 21 days in which to file her Amended Complaint. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the case. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 5/21/15. (jlw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH NORTHERN DIVISION DIANE R. PRIGGE, Plaintiff, ORDER PARTIALLY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION vs. WOODS CROSS POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER MATTHEWS, DETECTIVE HOFFMAN, SGT. SANTOS, CHIEF BUTLER, Case No. 1:14-CV-87 Judge Dee Benson Defendants. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner, recommending (1) that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed and (2) that “Plaintiff be given leave to file an amended complaint that complies with the applicable pleading requirements within twenty-one days.” (Dkt. No. 7.) The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days after receiving it. Neither party has filed such an objection. Having reviewed all relevant materials, including the reasoning set forth in the 1 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the court adopts the Report and Recommendation with a slight adjustment. The court agrees that plaintiff’s complaint, as presently filed, is insufficient. Accordingly, and in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation, the court hereby grants plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint that complies with the applicable pleading requirements. Plaintiff shall have twenty-one days in which to file her Amended Complaint. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 21st day of May, 2015. _________________________________ Dee Benson United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?