Webb v. Swensen et al

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 3 Complaint, filed by David Webb ; denying 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 5 Motion for Service of Process. See order for details. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 2/27/15. (jlw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH DAVID WEBB, Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. ELIJAH SWENSEN, TRAVIS KEARL, ALICIA MARIE WASHINGTON, TWO JOHN DOES, and MICHAEL ASHMENT (OGDEN CITY CHIEF OF POLICE), Case No. 1:14-CV-148 District Judge Dee Benson Defendants. Before the court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on January 30, 2015, recommending that this court dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), deny Plaintiff’s motion for service of process, and deny Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel. (Dkt. No. 8.) The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days after receiving it. On February 9, 2015, Plaintiff David Webb filed a document titled “Pro Se Plaintiff’s Objections to R&R Dated 30 January 2015.” (Dkt. No. 10.) Having reviewed all relevant materials, including Plaintiff’s objection, and the reasoning set forth in the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court hereby: (1) DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (Dkt. No. 3); (2) DENIES without prejudice Plaintiff’s motion for service of process (Dkt. No. 5.); and (3) DENIES without prejudice Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel. (Dkt. No. 4.) IT IS SO ORDERED DATED this 27th day of February, 2015. __________________________________ Dee Benson United States District Court Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?