Webb v. Swensen et al
Filing
45
ORDER ADOPTING 42 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: denying 36 Motion for Rule 54(b) Certification; denying 40 Motion to Amend. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 6/1/2016. (blh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
DAVID WEBB,
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
v.
ELIJAH SWENSEN, TRAVIS KEARL,
ALICIA MARIE WASHINGTON, ANDY
MUELLER, BENJAMIN REINKINS
SOKOLIK, MICHAEL ASHMENT, BRETT
JAY LYMAN, AND CLINT R. DRAKE,
Case No. 1:14-cv-00148-DB-DBP
District Judge Dee Benson
Defendants.
Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead
Before the court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate
Judge Dustin B. Pead on May 5, 2016, recommending that this Court: (1) deny Plaintiff’s motion
to amend (Dkt. No. 40) and (2) deny Plaintiff’s motion for Rule 54(b) certification (Dkt. No. 36).
The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and
Recommendation within fourteen (14) days after receiving it. On May 12, 2016, Plaintiff filed
“Pro Se Plaintiff Webb’s Objections to R&R.” (Dkt. No. 43.)
Having reviewed the Plaintiff’s pro se objection, the record before the Magistrate Judge,
and the reasoning set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court
ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as
follows:
1. Plaintiff’s motion to amend is DENIED.
2. Plaintiff’s motion for Rule 54(b) certification is DENIED.
3. The Court orders the above captioned case to be closed.
1
DATED this 1st day of June, 2016.
_________________________________
Dee Benson
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?