Webb v. Kier Property Management and Real Estate et al
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Case Closed.; Motions terminated: 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by David Webb, 18 MOTION to Amend/Correct 3 Complaint, filed by David Webb, 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION S re 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by David Webb, 3 Complaint, filed by David Webb, 8 MOTION for Protective Order and Memorandum in Support filed by David Webb., 19 MOTION re 18 MOTION to Amend/Correct 3 Complaint, filed by David Webb, 8 MOTION for Protective Order and Memorandum in Support filed by David Webb.; adopting Report and Recommendations re 16 Report and Recommendations.; denying 18 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 19 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. See Order for details. Signed by Judge David Sam on 9/19/16. (jmr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
NORTHERN DIVISION
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
DAVID WEBB,
)
Plaintiff,
v.
KIER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
and REAL ESTATE et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 1:16CV00001DS
)
)
ORDER
)
)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
This matter is before the Court on the May 19, 2016 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)
(Doc. #16) by United States Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells. The R&R is incorporated herein
by reference. Plaintiff has filed a timely objection to the R&R.
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Plaintiff’s objections are without
merit and are OVERRULED. The well reasoned R&R is ADOPTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
All Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED.
Plaintiff’s motion to Amend/Correct the complaint (#18) and Supplemental motion to
Amend/Correct the complaint (#19) are also DENIED as the R&R has determined that further
amendment would be futile.
DATED this 19th day of September, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
DAVID SAM
SENIOR JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?