Purdy v. Metlife Home Loans et al

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 Report and Recommendations: The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 7) is ADOPTED IN FULL. The above-captioned case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 1/12/17. (jlw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION HOMER E. PURDY, Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. Case No. 1:16-cv-00028-JNP-EJF METLIFE HOME LOANS, LINDBURG & ASSOCIATES, JP MORGAN CHASE, ETITLE INSURANCE AGENCY, District Judge Jill N. Parrish Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse Defendants. Before the court is a Report and Recommendation entered by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on November 14, 2016. (Docket No. 7). The Magistrate recommends that the above captioned case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to serve under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation provided that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days of service. The time for response has expired and the court has received no objections from any party. Based on the court’s de novo review of the record, the relevant authorities, and Judge Furse’s Report and Recommendation, the court concludes that the Report and Recommendation is a correct application of the law and facts. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 7) is ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. The above-captioned case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED this, the 12th day of January, 2016. BY THE COURT: ________________________________________ JILL N. PARRISH United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?