Horsley v. Colvin
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Complaint filed by Julia K. Phillips Horsley. The Magistrate Judge's June 29, 2017, Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED IN FULL. It is ORDERED that the ALJ's decision is AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 7/17/2017. (eat)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
JULIA K. PHILLIPS-HORSELY,
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
Case No. 1:16-CV-30 TS
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
District Judge Ted Stewart
Plaintiff filed her Complaint on March 17, 2016. 1 This case was subsequently referred to
the Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). 2 The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
Recommendation on June 29, 2017. 3 This matter is before the Court for consideration of that
Report and Recommendation.
The Magistrate Judge recommends that the ALJ’s decision be affirmed because it is
supported by substantial evidence and is free of legal error.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), a party has fourteen days from their receipt of the Report
and Recommendation to file an objection. Neither party has done so. The Court has considered
the pleadings in the file and the Report and Recommendation.
Docket No. 2. The Complaint was originally filed against then-Acting Commissioner of
Social Security, Carolyn W. Colvin. Nancy A. Berryhill became the Acting Commissioner of
Social Security on January 23, 2017, and was substituted as Defendant on June 29, 2017. See
Docket No. 33.
Docket No. 16.
Docket No. 32.
It is therefore
ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s June 29, 2017 Report and Recommendation
(Docket No. 32) is ADOPTED IN FULL. It is further ORDERED that the ALJ’s decision is
DATED this 17th day of July, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?