Barrus v. Colvin

Filing 28

ORDER ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED IN FULL. The court reverses the final agency decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the disability insurance benefits claimed by Mr. Barrus and remands for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation issued by Judge Furse. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 10/18/17. (dla)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH VAUGHN BARRUS, Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Case No. 1:16-cv-00056-JNP-EJF Judge Jill N. Parrish Defendant. On September 16, 2017, Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse issued a Report and Recommendation that this court remand for further consideration the final agency decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the disability insurance benefits claimed by Vaughn Barrus. [Docket 27]. The Report and Recommendation advised the defendant, Nancy Berryhill, that a failure to object within 14 days of service could result in a waiver of objections upon review by this court. Ms. Berryhill did not file an objection. Ms. Berryhill’s failure to object waived any argument that the Report and Recommendation was in error. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). The court need not apply this waiver rule as a procedural bar if “the interests of justice so dictate.” Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991). The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and its conclusion that the Commissioner’s denial of benefits should be reversed and remanded for a rehearing. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (“The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.”). The court concludes that the Report and Recommendation is not clearly erroneous and finds that the interests of justice do not warrant deviation from the waiver rule. The court, therefore, ADOPTS IN FULL the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation [Docket 27] is ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. The court reverses the final agency decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the disability insurance benefits claimed by Mr. Barrus and remands for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation issued by Judge Furse. SO ORDERED October 18, 2017. BY THE COURT: ______________________________________ JILL N. PARRISH United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?