Conger v. Home Depot USA et al

Filing 11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE- Plaintiffs are directed to respond in writing by 10/2/20 and inform the Court of the status of the case and intentions to proceed re: Defendant Linyi Heng Sheng Wood Industry Co. Failure to do so will result in dismissal as to this defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 9/25/20. (alf)

Download PDF
FILED 2020 SEP 25 AM 9:40 CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT STATE OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION BONNIE LOU CONGER, Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE vs. Case No. 1:20-cv-00043-DBP HOME DEPOT USA, TARACA PACIFIC, LINYI HENG SHENG WOOD INDUSTRY CO., Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendants. On April 24, 2020, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441 and 1446, Defendant Home Depot removed the above entitled action to federal court. (ECF No. 2.) Defendants Home Depot and Taraca Pacific have accepted service and filed Answers. (ECF No. 2-2; 2-3; 4-2; 4-7; 8; 9.) There is no indication, however, that Defendant Linyi Heng Sheng Wood Industry Co. has been served and the time within which to do so has expired. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service within 90 days after a complaint is filed. Specifically, the rule states: If defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 1 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby Ordered to Show Cause, within seven (7) days of the date of this Order, as to why her claims against Defendant Linyi Heng Sheng Wood Industry Co. should not be dismissed for failure to effect timely service. Plaintiffs’ failure to show cause by October 2, 2020 will result in a recommendation of dismissal as to this Defendant. DATED this 25th day of September, 2020. BY THE COURT ________________________________ DUSTIN B. PEAD Magistrate Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?