SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Filing 143

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Novell, Inc. (Novell, Inc.'s Second Set of Interrogatories and Third Set of Requests for Production to The SCO Group, Inc.) (Sneddon, Heather)

Download PDF
SCO Grp v. Novell Inc Doc. 143 Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW Document 143 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 2 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs (pro hac vice) Kenneth W. Brakebill (pro hac vice) 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 ANDERSON & KARRENBERG Thomas R. Karrenberg, #3726 John P. Mullen, #4097 Heather M. Sneddon, #9520 700 Bank One Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Telephone: (801) 534-1700 Facsimile: (801) 364-7697 Attorneys for Novell, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant, vs. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case No. 2:04CV00139 Judge Dale A. Kimball I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 27th day of September, 2006, I caused a true and correct copy of NOVELL, INC.'S SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO THE SCO GROUP, INC., NOVELL, INC.'S THIRD SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW Document 143 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 2 of 2 THE SCO GROUP, INC., and this CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE to be served to the following: Via hand delivery: Brent O. Hatch Mark F. James HATCH JAMES & DODGE, P.C. 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Via first class U.S. mail, postage prepaid: Stephen N. Zack Mark J. Heise BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 100 Southeast Second Street, Suite 2800 Miami, Florida 33131 DATED: September 27, 2006. ANDERSON & KARRENBERG /s/ Heather M. Sneddon Thomas R. Karrenberg John P. Mullen Heather M. Sneddon Attorneys for Novell, Inc. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?