SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Filing 197

Ex Parte (Not Sealed) MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages (Overlength Reply to SCO's Opposition to Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction) filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Sneddon, Heather)

Download PDF
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW SCO Grp v. Novell Inc Document 197-2 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 1 of 2 D Doc. 197 Att. MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs (pro hac vice) Kenneth W. Brakebill (pro hac vice) 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 ANDERSON & KARRENBERG Thomas R. Karrenberg, #3726 John P. Mullen, #4097 Heather M. Sneddon, #9520 700 Chase Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Telephone: (801) 534-1700 Facsimile: (801) 364-7697 Attorneys for Novell, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant, v s. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff. ORDER GRANTING NOVELL INC.'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN OVERLENGTH REPLY MEMORANDUM Case No. 2:04CV00139 Judge Dale A. Kimball This matter comes before the Court on Novell, Inc.'s Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File an Overlength Repl y Memorandum. The Court, having considered the matter, and good cause and exceptional circumstances appearing, hereby ORDERS that Novell, Inc. be granted leave to Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW Document 197-2 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 2 of 2 file an overlength Reply to SCO's Opposition to Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction. DATED this _____ day of January, 2007. BY THE COURT: ______________________________________ Judge Dale A. Kimball United States District Court Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?