SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Filing 211

NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of (1)SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Motion for Partial Summary on its Fourth Counterclaim for Relief, and in Support of SCO's Motion for Summary Judgment (2) Declaration of Brent O. Hatch filed by Counter Defendant SCO Group, Plaintiff SCO Group (Hatch, Brent)

SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Doc. 211

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 211

Filed 01/17/2007

Page 1 of 2

Brent O. Hatch (5715) Mark F. James (5295) HATCH, JAMES & DODGE 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Stuart H. Singer (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard--Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for The SCO Group, Inc.

Robert Silver (admitted pro hac vice) Edward Normand (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Bank of America Tower--Suite 2800 100 Southeast Second Street Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

THE SCO GROUP, INC. Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, v. NOVELL, INC., Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.

NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILINGS Case No. 2:04cv139 Honorable Dale A. Kimball Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Plaintiff has conventionally filed the original and two courtesy copies of the following documents:

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 211

Filed 01/17/2007

Page 2 of 2

1. SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Fourth Counterclaim for Relief, and in Support of SCO's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (the "Memorandum in Opposition") 2. Declaration of Brent O. Hatch (the "Declaration") This Memorandum in Opposition and Declaration have not been filed electronically because: ___ it cannot be converted to electronic format

___ the electronic file size of this material exceeds 2 megabytes (MB) ___ the Court by order has excused electronic filing _X_ they are exempt from electronic filing pursuant to § F(4)(e) of the ECF Policy & Procedures Manual (sealed document) These documents will be served conventionally on all parties. DATED this 17th day of January, 2007. HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C. Brent O. Hatch Mark F. James BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Robert Silver Stuart H. Singer Stephen N. Zack Edward Normand

By:

/s/ Brent O. Hatch Counsel for The SCO Group, Inc.