SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Filing 224

Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim filed by Counter Defendant SCO Group, Plaintiff SCO Group. (Normand, Edward)

SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Doc. 224

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 224

Filed 01/18/2007

Page 1 of 3

Brent O. Hatch (5715) Mark F. James (5295) HATCH, JAMES & DODGE 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Stuart H. Singer (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard ­ Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Devan V. Padmanabhan (admitted pro hac vice) John J. Brogan (admitted pro hac vice) DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for The SCO Group, Inc.

Robert Silver (admitted pro hac vice) Edward Normand (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Bank of America Tower ­ Suite 2800 100 Southeast Second Street Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH THE SCO GROUP, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. NOVELL, INC., Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff. Case No. 2:04CV00139 Honorable Dale A. Kimball Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells SCO'S CROSS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON NOVELL'S FOURTH COUNTERCLAIM

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 224

Filed 01/18/2007

Page 2 of 3

Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, the SCO Group, Inc. ("SCO"), pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Novell, Inc.'s ("Novell's") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Its Fourth Counterclaim for Relief and in Support of SCO's Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, respectfully moves this Court to enter partial summary judgment for SCO on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim. SCO is entitled to partial summary judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim because the evidence of the parties' intent under the APA and Amendments thereto is undisputed in SCO's favor. For the foregoing reasons, and as more fully set forth in the referenced memorandum, this Court should enter partial summary judgment in favor of SCO. DATED this 18th day of January, 2007. By: /s/ Edward Normand

HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C. Brent O. Hatch Mark F. James BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Robert Silver (admitted pro hac vice) Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice) Stuart H. Singer (admitted pro hac vice) Edward Normand (admitted pro hac vice) DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP Devan V. Padmanabhan (admitted pro hac vice) John J. Brogan (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for The SCO Group, Inc.

2

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 224

Filed 01/18/2007

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, The SCO Group, Inc., hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim was served on Defendant, Novell, Inc., on this 18th day of January, 2007, via CM/ECF to the following: Thomas R. Karrenberg John P. Mullen Heather M. Sneddon ANDERSON & KARRENBERG 700 Bank One Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Michael A. Jacobs Matthew I. Kreeger MORRISON & FOERSTER 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482

/s/ Edward Normand