SCO Grp v. Novell Inc
Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Normand, Edward)
SCO Grp v. Novell Inc
Doc. 230 Att. 1
Page 1 of 2
Brent O. Hatch (5715) Mark F. James (5295) HATCH, JAMES & DODGE 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: (801) 363-6363 Facsimile: (801) 363-6666 Stuart H. Singer (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 356-0011 Facsimile: (954) 356-0022 Attorneys for The SCO Group, Inc.
Robert Silver (admitted pro hac vice) Edward Normand (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Bank of America TowerSuite 2800 100 Southeast Second Street Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 539-8400 Facsimile: (305) 539-1307
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff /Counterclaim-Defendant, v. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff. Case No. 2:04CV00139 Honorable Dale A. Kimball Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Page 2 of 2
Pursuant to the Stipulation between Plaintiff /Counterclaim-Defendant The SCO Group, Inc. ( SCO ) and Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell, Inc. ( Novell ), and good cause " " " " appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that SCO may file a reply in support of SCO's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims on or before January 31, 2007. DATED: ______________, 2007. BY THE COURT: _______________________________ DALE A. KIMBALL U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?