SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Filing 231

NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of SCO's Reply Memorandum in Support of Its Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novells Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims filed by Counter Defendant SCO Group, Plaintiff SCO Group re 180 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON NOVELL'S THIRD, SIXTH, SEVENTH, EIGHTH AND NINTH COUNTERCLAIMS (Hatch, Brent)

SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Doc. 231

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 231

Filed 01/31/2007

Page 1 of 2

Brent O. Hatch (5715) Mark F. James (5295) HATCH, JAMES & DODGE 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Stuart H. Singer (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard--Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for The SCO Group, Inc.

Robert Silver (admitted pro hac vice) Edward Normand (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Bank of America Tower--Suite 2800 100 Southeast Second Street Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

THE SCO GROUP, INC. Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, v. NOVELL, INC., Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.

NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING OF SCO'S REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON NOVELL'S THIRD, SIXTH, SEVENTH, EIGHTH AND NINTH COUNTERCLAIMS Case No. 2:04cv139 Honorable Dale A. Kimball Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, The SCO Group, Inc., has conventionally filed the original and two courtesy copies of their Reply Memorandum in Support of Its Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 231

Filed 01/31/2007

Page 2 of 2

Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims (the "Reply Memorandum"). This Reply Memorandum has not been filed electronically because: ___ it cannot be converted to electronic format

___ the electronic file size of this material exceeds 2 megabytes (MB) ___ the Court by order has excused electronic filing _X_ it is exempt from electronic filing pursuant to § F(4)(e) of the ECF Policy & Procedures Manual (sealed document) This document will be served conventionally on all parties. DATED this 31st day of January, 2007. HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C. Brent O. Hatch Mark F. James BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Robert Silver Stuart H. Singer Stephen N. Zack Edward Normand

By:

/s/ Brent O. Hatch Counsel for The SCO Group, Inc.