SCO Grp v. Novell Inc
Filing
260
DECLARATION of Edward Normand re 259 Memorandum in Support of Motion, filed by SCO Group. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 Part 1# 2 Exhibit 1 Part 2# 3 Exhibit 1 Part 3# 4 Exhibit 1 Part 4# 5 Exhibit 2-9# 6 Exhibit 10-20# 7 Exhibit 21-27# 8 Exhibit 28-31# 9 Exhibit 32-34# 10 Exhibit 35 Part 1# 11 Exhibit 35 Part 2# 12 Exhibit 36-41)(Normand, Edward)
SCO Grp v. Novell Inc
Doc. 260 Att. 2
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 1 of 20
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 2 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 3 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 4 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 5 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 6 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 7 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 8 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 9 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 10 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 11 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 12 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 13 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 14 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 15 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 16 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 17 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 18 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 19 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 260-3
Filed 04/09/2007
Page 20 of 20
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?